Laserfiche WebLink
� 275 seconded by Councilman Anderson; that the.recommendation._of..the Planning..Com- <br /> • mission be acoepted with,the exception�of the request ior no eidewalke and <br /> � that that requeat be denied. Motion passed unaniraously. <br /> Planning_Commiseion recommendation Mo..7:�, Favorably reoommended that F. C. � <br /> . , <br /> Duffy be granted permiseion to locate a-soft drinks bottling works on Lot 12, <br /> � Block.27 of Eastern Addition, southeily oorner of 3pruoe and $hasta 3treets. <br /> ',� �Mr. Duffy appeared in behalf of his request and adv.ised that the property <br /> appeared to be in the oommercial dietrict and triat his buainesa �rould not <br /> conetitute a muieance, Councilman Britschgi moved, seconded by Counallman <br /> Fletcher, that the reoommendation of the Planning Commission be accepted, <br /> ' Motion paesed unanimouely. , s <br /> Mr. 14. H, Morrissey, attorney, appeared in beha.lY oY H. H. �Jeiner in regard to <br /> , nis request for cancellation of delinquencies on lote in the Lenolt Traot, <br /> . Mr. Morriesey advised that in 1940 tne Weat Coast Life was inetituting fore- <br /> closure proaeedings a,gainst this.propert�y whiah was unimproved. Mr. Weiner <br /> paid the interest due tne West Coast Life and the Couneil entered into an <br /> • agreement with him that if he bought 102 lots in thie tract and got them <br /> back on to the sesessment roll, tne-Qounoil would aCCept one half of all <br /> penaltiee and a11 the taxes, Mr..Moiriseey stated that the present�request <br /> was in conformity with thie agreement: City Attorney McCarthy read a letter <br /> from City Oollector Miramontes which had been preeented at an earlier meet- <br /> ing eetting forth the offer made.by.Mr. Weiner as followe: Lot 8, Block 10, � <br /> e <br /> , Lenolt, total delinquenciee �1253 - Mr. Afeiner offered �700. Lot 8, Blook 7, <br /> Lenolt, total delinquencies, �728,85 - Mr. Weiner's offer, �515,,. Lot 2, <br /> � <br /> Block 10, Lenolt, total delinquenciea, �733.59 - Mr. Weiner�s offer, �525, <br /> Councilm�n Armstrong believed�it wae highly improper for the council to <br /> aompromise the indebtedneee oi a property.owner to the city on the basis of <br /> an offer. He believed the proper method would be to have the lote put up <br /> Yor publlc eal.e and bid for. Mr, Morrisaey etated that when the orignal <br /> agreement wae made it vrae felt that the citq would get a better offer than <br /> .� the lote would bring in a public sale. •Councilman Anderson said he con- <br /> curred in Councilman Armetrong'e opinion bu that at the time the agreement <br /> was made it was felt tne terme of the agreement were the best the city <br /> could do and that inasmuch as there remained only three lote to be redeemed, <br /> he did not believe a change shculd be made at thie time. Counoilman <br /> ' Andereon moved that the city accept payment of taxes a�ainet the above men- <br /> tioned lots in full and one-half of the penalties. Tne motion was seconded <br /> bq Counciiman Fletcher. Under tne question, Councilman Armstrong aeked <br /> . what was to be done witn the eeRer bonde which Mr; Weiner holde, Mr.. ' <br /> ' 4Peiner advised ne would eurrender the sewer bonds, City Manager Hlom advieed <br /> that tne County Taa Collector had included one of the lots in question in <br /> nine parcela Yor eale for delinquent taxes, Mr. VPeiner advised he had <br /> paid the county taxea and that } the..lot would not go on sale. Motion paeeed <br /> with Oouncilman Armetrong.voting in the negatine, <br /> City Clerk Dodge reported tnat he had sent out poet card notices.to property <br /> � ownere on Beech 3treet in regard to improvemente on tnat etreet. Fourteen <br /> \ . <br />