My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2011-08-22
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
AgdaPkt 2011-08-22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2012 12:02:59 PM
Creation date
8/18/2011 4:39:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
8/22/2011
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
456
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6.1.G. - Page 8 <br /> a difference in managernent rESponse and fiscal health between cities that have reserve <br /> policies vs. those that don't? <br /> • Da�a Evaluatid� — Is it feasible to coz�pare cities' and the County's data far the same <br /> �evel of reserves or ather financial metric and draw concIusions of relative health, or are <br /> circumstances sa different or unique to each city to � that impracticaI? <br /> This report was compiled fraFn numerous sources: <br /> � The prizxzary documents (applicable sections, manage�nent discussions, #�anancial <br /> staternez�ts and explanatory notes) reviewed were city and County Compreh�nsive <br /> Annual Financial Reports (CAFRs}. These are standard reports prepa�ed £ollowing the <br /> guideIines recommended by the Governm�nt �'inance Officers Association af the United <br /> States and Camada (GFOA), and the standards adopted by the Gavernrnental Accaunting <br /> Standards Board (GASB}. <br /> • Responses to a written questionnaire sent to all city Finance Diz or their <br /> counterparts, requesting data not available or not found on the public websites, including <br /> e�ister�ce {or no�} of governing ordinances and p4licies and forward-laoking data <br /> (forecasts). l�Tote: This questiannaire did not go the County becaus� the inforrnation <br /> sought was clearly delineat�d in its annual CAFRs. <br /> • Ir�terviews cond�ucted with two current city Finance Dir�ctors, a forrner senior County <br /> offcial knowledgeable of County finances and Governmental Accounting Standards, and <br /> two principals of one of the ]eading indepen�ent auditing �z z for a <br /> sigz�z�cant nunnber of 2010 and past CAFRs of San Mateo Caunty cities. The primary <br /> purpose of the interviews was to determine where there was reasonable cansensus an key <br /> rr�etz for evaluatzng a city's or County's fisca� �ealth, and to understand where those <br /> data could be obtained an�/or naw they could be calculated. <br /> • Other publzc docurnents found on city and County websites, including Approved Annual <br /> Bud�ets (Budgets) and other financial reparts. <br /> • O��cia� �ublications such as GASB 3� and GASB 54 were used to research and <br /> unaerstand applicable goveraunent accounting standards and published recommendations <br /> with respect ta reserves. <br /> Note; Drrta used Zo compile this report was provided to �'ity/County Finance offica'als for <br /> veri�cation, with requests for publicly available dacument and page number references <br /> to enable confirmation. Any errors identified were corrected. In some cases, responses <br /> ineluded questions or concerns about the applicability of a speeific data element or <br /> methad of calculation, ezther generically or to a city's specific circumstc�nces. Those <br /> comments were considered ancl, �vher�e appropriate, specifieally ac�dressed or noted <br /> without attributzon in this report. <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.