AgdaPkt 2011-08-22 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

6.1. G. - Page 15 Tab[e 1 Net Change in GFB Year #o Year I City 2{]06 20�7 2Q08 2009 201� � Hilisborou�� * ' , + � �_ San Carlas �. ' � "' r r Colma -. :- 4 • f - — { ,. na Millbrae ± "' + y � _ �' San Mateo County * ` ` ` � �T . + � � I 5an Bruno + + * .; �. * Half Moon Bay * � * '' � + _ Pacifica y � ' :. I na Sauth San Francisco �' ":' ;. ' � � I East Palo Alto � * + * } i I 8eimont � ? '' ' : : . : �,° � + I Redwood City + + * : ' ,�. f I Daly City * * * . i � � San Mateo � * � . . . . 'F �f � �F . L . ... _ . _' _ __ . Foster GtY * t i ' s _ i. I I Menlo �Park � � ' ( ` ` . . w . * �, I Atherton ' � ; � ; I i Burlingame { ' ; :. + Partola Valkey * * � - ` _ � �. � I Bris6ane '' + + y na � Woadside �' # : �- � _e i. � ? I increase to GFB, from preurous year i I dECrease to G�B, from previous year na I data not avai�able I ..; consecuti�e increase to GFB, from previous year I •. i ,� consecuti�e decrease to GFB, from previous year It is noteworthy that while rrver half the cities (11 of 20) have drar�n down thezr General Fur�d Balance in t�e last two or more reported yeaz three czties (Saz� Carlos, Colrzxa and Hiils3�arough) have managed to increase it. Fiscal year {FY) 2008-9 was clearly the most cha7lenging, as 15 of �0 cities and the County drew down their GFB that y�ear ta balance tl�eir budgets. Whi�e exannining the n�.mber o�' consecutzve years a city oz County zn.cz or decreased 'ats UGFB is useful, it is necessa� to also evaluate the magnitude of the changes and wheth�r it is widening or �arrowing as an indicator of its sxg�i�'icance. As �oted, there �vere 11 cities with declining GFB in the most recent twa or more canseeutive years. Not reflected in the chart is that the magnitude af the decline was greater in 2009-2010 vs. 20Q8-9 in saven of the�n: (Belinont, Redwood City, Dal� City, Foster City, MenIo Park, Brisbane, and Woodside). 10