My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2011-08-22
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
AgdaPkt 2011-08-22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2012 12:02:59 PM
Creation date
8/18/2011 4:39:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
8/22/2011
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
456
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6.5.A. - Page 1 <br /> RE PO RT <br /> To the Honorable Mayor and City Council <br /> From the City Manager <br /> August 22, 2011 <br /> SUBJECT <br /> Amend Redwood City Municipal Code Regarding Business License Tax <br /> RECOMMENDATION <br /> Waive second reading and adopt an Ordinance Amending Sections 32.152, 32.153, and <br /> 32.155 of the Redwood City Municipal Code Regarding the Business License Tax <br /> BACKGROUND <br /> The current Business License Tax ordinance needs to be modified to bring it current. In <br /> 1990, the City Council adopted the business license tax rates and provided for annual <br /> inflation adjustment rates through Fiscal Year 1994-1995. In 1995, the City Council <br /> amended the rates to provide for ongoing annual inflation adjustments but these were <br /> invalidated by Proposition 218. The rate adjustments made through Fiscal Year 1994- <br /> 1995 remained in effect by authority of the 1990 ordinance. While the City has been <br /> correctly charging the 1990 rates as modified by inflation through Fiscal Year 1994- <br /> 1995, the Municipal Code does not correctly reflect those rates. Therefore, the current <br /> amendment is proposed to bring the Code into compliance with law and with practice. <br /> This ordinance does not go to the voters and is merely a technical correction for <br /> historical purposes. (See Exhibit 1, ordinance Amending Sections 32.152, 32.153 and <br /> 32.155) <br /> ALTERNATIVES <br /> 1. Do not adopt ordinance with proposed amendments, which would result in potential <br /> confusion in the Municipal Code. <br /> FISCAL IMPACT <br /> None. <br /> fj � <br /> PAMELA THOMPSON <br /> CITY ATTORNEY <br /> �� <br /> ROBERT B. BELL <br /> CITY MANAGER <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.