Laserfiche WebLink
8.A. - Page 1 <br /> RE PO RT <br /> To the Honorable Mayor and City Council <br /> From the City Manager <br /> August 22, 2011 <br /> SUBJECT <br /> Appeal of the certification of an Environmental Impact Report for Laurel Way Project <br /> RECOMMENDATION <br /> 1. Grant the appeal; <br /> 2. Direct staff to revise the EIR to remedy the two deficiencies it has identified. <br /> Further direct that, after staff has remedied those deficiencies, the matter be referred <br /> back to the Planning Commission to reconsider the adequacy of the EIR as revised. <br /> SUMMARY/OVERVIEW <br /> This matter involves an appeal of the Planning Commission's August 24, 2010 decision <br /> to certify an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Laurel Way Planned <br /> Development, which involves a proposal to develop up to 18 single-family homes on 20 <br /> existing hillside lots, owned by 16 different parties. The applicant is the Laurel Way <br /> Joint Venture (LWJV), which represents all but three of the owners. The appeal was <br /> filed by a resident (Carrie Simon) on behalf of a neighborhood group (Concerned <br /> Neighbors of Proposed Laurel Way Planned Development Project). Appellants contend <br /> that the EIR does not adequately analyze the environmental impacts of the proposed <br /> development. <br /> The existing lots are much smaller than what the City's existing code allows, given their <br /> steep slopes. However, the lots were lawfully created through a subdivision map filed in <br /> 1926. The lots are thus legal nonconforming, and, under section 33.2 of the City's <br /> Zoning Code, the owners are entitled to develop the lots notwithstanding their small <br /> size, so long as the development complies with all other code requirements. Such <br /> development requires City approval of one or more Planned Development Permits. <br /> LWJV filed an application for a Planned Development Permit in 2007, and the EIR was <br /> prepared to analyze this proposed development. That application was still pending <br /> when the Planning Commission certified the EIR. With the agreement of both LWJV <br /> and the appellants, City staff deferred scheduling a hearing on the appeal of that <br /> certification pending the Planning Commission's consideration of that permit application. <br /> The Planning Commission held a hearing on December 7, 2010, at which time the City <br /> learned that not all of the property owners had authorized LWJV to file the application <br /> on their behalf. <br />