My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2011-08-22
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
AgdaPkt 2011-08-22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2012 12:02:59 PM
Creation date
8/18/2011 4:39:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
8/22/2011
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
456
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8.A. - Page 8 <br /> .. - �. -. ..- �- . <br /> Average Slope of the Percent Reduction of Site Area for Maximum Floor Area <br /> Lot Calculations� <br /> 10.01-20% 5%, plus 1% for each 1% of slope over 10% <br /> 20.01-30% 15%, plus 2% for each 1% over 20% <br /> Over 30% 35% <br /> Notes: <br /> ' Where the average slope is a fractional number, the slope shall be rounded up to the <br /> next whole number. <br /> The issue of the appropriate home sizes has been the source of some confusion. The <br /> Draft EIR reported that the average home size in the neighborhood surrounding the <br /> proposed development is approximately 2,141 square feet. On the other hand, the <br /> Final EIR includes (at Appendix C) a survey of other homes in the area, which shows <br /> that the average home size in the area is actually 3,964 square feet, which is very close <br /> to the average home size proposed by the applicant (3,965 square feet). However, as <br /> noted above, staff believes that the data in Appendix C to be flawed and that the <br /> average home size reported in the Draft EIR is actually more reflective of existing <br /> conditions. <br /> Because no application is currently pending, the City does not need to decide what the <br /> appropriate home size should be for the proposed development. However, should the <br /> City Council believe that a smaller average home size may be more appropriate for <br /> hillside development, it would be prudent for the City to initiate an amendment of the <br /> Zoning Code to ensure that a consistent standard is applied in the future to all hillside <br /> development within the City, including the current proposed development. Thus, it <br /> would be appreciated if the Council could provide staff additional direction. <br /> This request is consistent with direction provided in the recently adopted 2010 General <br /> Plan (Built Environment Element, Urban Form and Land Use Chapter, page BE-83). <br /> Implementing Program BE-1 states, among other things, the intent to a floor area ratios <br /> (FAR) limits on residential development. FAR limits may vary based on neighborhood <br /> typology, context, and site-specific conditions including slope. <br /> Peninsula Conflict Resolution Center Facilitation <br /> In order to allow all parties to better-understand their respective positions, the City <br /> organized a meeting which was facilitated by the Peninsula Conflict Resolution Center <br /> (PCRC) on March 29, 2011. This meeting provided additional insight regarding the <br /> proposed issues related to developing in this neighborhood. At this meeting, the PCRC <br /> documented the information, which is enclosed. (Attachment 6) Also, the City provided <br /> a venue for the concerned parties to meet face-to-face in a neutral environment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.