AgdaPkt 2011-08-22 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

f3 'i2 � � 8.A. - Page 13 does not c�early dis#�ng�ish beiween roadway which is improved ta City standards and the substandar�d �aved portion. The Resolution refers ��chibit A, desc�ibed be�aw. � Exhibi� ,4 � MaD: The �IR — No E!R Line shown an the map, as an exhibit to th� Resatution clearly matches the description of the �ocaiuon of the tirie in the Deoember '� 8, 200q staff repart. The property owner of 373Q �urel Way has inf�tmed the City that he believes tF�at tF�a resoiutiar� I�r�guage irnpl�es �tat any properEy with frontage an any paved pnrtian of Laurel Way� either t� C�ty standards, Qr substandarc! as is #he case with his pnoper�y, can be de�e�aped withaut an ElR. Staff disagrees with fhis ir�terpretation based on the specrfi� information in #he 2�Otl staff reporE and the map, Exhibit A� whic� sf�ows the I�ne de�ineating beiween the standar�d ar�d subs�tar�dard pavir�g, �urthemeore, �e resoEuti�� �Isn �or�tains lang�age tha# refers ta tF�e pr�esenoe a� utiiities witl�in #he standarcJ pave�i portion and the rest �f #he street. Since Decem�ar 2Q0�� P�anning Senrices has vonsistently �sed the map in A#tachmerit A fo� coun#er handauts to iriform the pub�ic abas�# development regulafior�s or� Laure� Way. At tf�e mee#ing on December '�8, 2p00 the staff pr�sentation, pubiic hear}ng, ar�d Councif discussian were refierenced to ths staff report. A Paw�er�airrt prsser�ta#iorr was also shown that Induded the map used for Att�cF�ment A�r� the resolution. S#aff si�or�gly believes tha# Coun�iE's ir�t�ntlah was �for tFEe "EIR — No EIR �ine" ta be loca#ed as shown on that map. Mfnutes to #he �ouncil rneetin� of Decernber 18, 2D40 ar+e pravided in Atta�hmerrt 5. St�ff beiieves that the resof�t�oR should be amend�d ta clerify the references #o paving� as proposed in Attachment G. The Council Mas Gonsidered ti�is policy with respect ta another property on the EIR side of the fine ir� aecernber 2003. The property awner of 3T38 Laurel Way so�gh# ta develop that lat with a singJe �mily horne without preparing �n EIR or tF�e other ptans and studies. 3738 Laurel V1lays frontage �ncludes bc�th ar� t�r�p�ved po�ifln ar�d a�aved, but su6s#andar� portic�n of the stree#. The Zaning A�lrnlnlstr�#or dertied tt�e Architectural Permit ansi t`�e property owner appeaied to Ci�y Council. The City Council d�n�ed the eppea�, which sup�orts the pa�icy �rat t�e intended ioca�ion for the EIR — Na E IR Line is as sharnm on the abo�e r�a�. Aiternative Detarmine that th� lor.ation of the "EIR — No E!R L.me" shnuld be at the transi#�on of the �aurel Way surtace from an unpaved sut�ss#andard ro�dway to a pa�ed, aitho�rgh also substandard roadway. Th is determinatit�n would aqaw fr�ur v��nt prop�rties e�st of $738 Laure! Way to be devefoped without preparation of an EIR. Fiscallmpact , There will be no char�ge in fiscal imp �f Council confirms the polir�r-as �f has been f administeted. �' 1 �. �. � � _ ; ' {�: r i . � .. f �k�s� P PatterSOn �-Ed Everett •� Senior Planner C muniiy Development Services Mana�� Clty Manager