Laserfiche WebLink
`� � � S <br /> �� 8.A. - Page 18 <br /> Esscn�ially, 3'�u have tw� options. They az+e: <br /> � Coatinue ta pensue a privatc reimbur�mant �geecr►ant from as many P�P�Y <br /> ownera aa po�ible � h�eip p�y far mnst o�the EIli,, �ical reports, sad st��eet <br /> impmvements. Clearly� the City Cow�cil be�ieved that the develaper �hould p�.y ivr <br /> most of the work, with a�rnnall c;oain'buti� by the City, U���ly, it may be <br /> di�i�t to r�nvince all the Prapc�tY own�rs t� can�ute given the var� int� <br /> and the aa�otwt �f money neGd�d. Yet, it wotild be to your 3�enefit to srt►dow as much <br /> effort a� pas�ible. <br /> � At�..othsr optinn would be to prepare and s�bmit ta Caminuaity Devetapment Se�vioea <br /> a detailed aaaiy&is of 3'�u� pmPa's�1. iac�udi�g gite p�, p�y l�cations <br /> des�rip'cm proposai, aad the writt�n e�d�ts��uont vf interested gropert}r owne�. <br /> {You alsa nnigbt w�nt to con�dCr a lazg� �ontributian since y�our amount pl�s tha <br /> City`� 18°!o cantributioa wi�l certai�ly not be enough ta cor�er th� costa of�he EIR gad <br /> techn�c.�l reports). St�ff` wi.Il then review yovr praPos�l, Fi'ePare a caver <br /> memarandum, and sead it ta tbe �ity Crruncil. If the City Cauneil aRer ravie�wing <br /> yaur proposat wants fa re-examine the po�icy, then st�,ff will schadnle thc item far � <br /> public hearing. If t�e po►licy c�s char�ge, tl� the EIIt aad prajact wouid still have to <br /> ga #hmug�t the narmat pi�ming procr.ss a� numemu� public hearings by tl�e <br /> Fl�ning Commissiaa and Piann.it�g staff. <br /> S incerely, <br /> ��� <br /> Tqm Petssanisi <br /> Pri�cipal Pl�nn�r <br /> C: Deborah Nelson <br /> Michael Chtu�ch <br /> Char�es C�icsman <br />