AgdaPkt 2011-08-22 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

� i� � - � 8.A. - Page 21 AT7AG�#MENT �,C Pl�nning Department �� lU Z 7 Mid�efield itoad � � Telepha�e (63a) 780-7Z34 �.�. Bm� 391 � u� � Em4it: �lan�g�redwoa�itY-org Redw�ood City, CA 940Cr4 �. Website: www tedwoodcitv.c� Se�ternber 29, 20D4 Scott Sweeney 179?a Qld Bam l.ane • Salinas, Ca. �3907 De�r Scott. On Septerr�ber 28, bcrth J�II Ekas and I met with you to discuss ynour wacant parcel on Laurel Vllay imrnediately west of 372f Launel (Assessor's Paroel Wumber 051-30?-25p), At the meef�ng you s#ated yaur be�ief #hat your par+cel di� not fali under the currar�t Laure� Way aeveloprnent poficy which prohibits ar�y devefnpmertt we�t of 372fi Lauref Way ur�t�i ar� Ernrironrr�rrt�I Impact ftepork (EiR) and o�ther technicai s#udies are completed for tF�e remair��ng v�cant sites. Yo� bel�evae that t�e intent a� Ciiy Council R�solu�ion 14171 adaptirrg thfs �licy anly r�lated to thase parceis which wen�s fronting on unpavaci portipns af Laurel Way r�h no aty irnpr+a�ernents ��d �rt�li�ies. Your paroel, howev�r, fror�ts on a pa�ed porfion of �.aurel Vllay (bu# not up fti City s#andands) with alI tF�e necassary ut�lity access. You afso highfighted di�stcxepane�es bet�yee� �an8uage in the Resolutfo�n and an exhibit �map), 'tfau believe tF�at the camect map should have shawed the pa�ved ar�d unpaved areas, and nat the demarcatiora I��a showirrg wh�t parc�l� ne�tled a� EIR. Both Jil! and i explained that planning staff was fo�lowfig t�e adop�d policy and it was v�ry cl�ar from the staff report a�oompanying fhe Resolutian that the City Council did indeed °d�w a iine in t�e sand" and that any develapmerit tv the west c� 3?2B Laur�I Way cauki not be bu�lt unfal the E!R and other stud'r�s ane �ompleted. The staff report tn #he City Council dai�d December f S, 200�� deariy sta#es under lssue #4� (Policy ftsr the Remainder o� k,a�rel 1Nay): Hotivever al! afher vacartt parrels along Laun�l W�y that ar� Jbc�fed w�sterly of 3726 La�r�l Way �rould have fo compl� wifh the req�rir�metrf that an E!R and techn�cal s�udies �9e�o8�caf, engfneerir�g. etc.� c�v�ering the entfie unde�neloped a►ea be preper�d prinr �o any devefopmenE in aacorrlar� witt� Courrcil's poliay adop#ed in 1998. A map was att�hed to the Resoiution wh�ch clearly showed those lots ne�ing an EIR. Your parcef is ar�� of �os� lats. Indeed� on Deaember 8, 20p3, th� Ci#y Coun�l� also used this sarne paficy and accompanying map as a basis for denying an Architectural Permit �`or a new home withot�t oampietian of emiranmenta! and I�rfrastructure s�rdies and plans a# 37�g Laure! Way.