My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2011-08-22
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
AgdaPkt 2011-08-22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2012 12:02:59 PM
Creation date
8/18/2011 4:39:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
8/22/2011
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
456
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8.A. - Page 69 <br /> Participants divided into three smaIl graups facilitated by PCRC. Each group incItzded area <br /> residents, Laurel Way Project property owners and interested parties. Staff and Mr, Haner <br /> circulated among tables as resources. <br /> GR�UPT <br /> x. Wlzat do 7�ou like abaut tlie pro�osal? <br /> • Positive that all neighbors �et to know each other <br /> • I have not gone to every meeting. If houses are 1500 square feet that would bring in <br /> more young families ta the neighborhood. Like the idea of young farnilies <br /> 2. W'hai concerns �ou? <br /> • Not sure what the proposal is <br /> • Don't lzke the Project <br /> � Ciky does not �naintau� Highland Ave. This Projeet vaill make it �nTorse <br /> • Prol�lem is there is no proposal <br /> � Confirrns that Cify Council does not I�sten <br /> • Number 1 concern is stability of tlze land. Concerned about landslides <br /> • Concerned about houses on North side of eul de sac. <br /> • The EIR is difficult to understand. Is the EIR trustworthy? <br /> • Issue of evaIuation the credibility of the EIR <br /> • The wildIife 11as not b�en addressed. Only o1�e day to say you didn't find the <br /> endangea�ed species <br /> � Road problem. Project wil� lead to more pot holes, more cars, more parking problenrts <br /> + Disruption during construction - 8 �nore �ears <br /> • Slump Iandside inentioned in the past <br /> • Concer�� t}�at xa7�d serves as a watershea. The �•unoff fro�x� 18 new 1lomes adds more. <br /> • If there is pressure on City t� approve this because they receive revenue — that is not a <br /> naturaI process. It is not right <br /> 3. How eould i�out� concern� be addressed? <br /> • Follow example - have two moderate size hoznes o�z t��ree lots. Have homes that are <br /> appropriate si�e for the conditions <br /> • Long term assurarice for protection of their investment — their home. <br /> • As property otvner, these are good questions <br /> • If peaple have questiox�s, rnake sure they can ge� right iz�forrnation <br /> • Does not want message to pr�vide "s�mple explanations" <br /> • Impact on eadl ho�.neowner different — but care about otlaers as wel� <br /> 4. Whrzt �zddiiiona2 inf�rrrtzatian cio yau need about this ��•�posal? <br /> + Is there a control for sp�culation? �f for young fami�ies may be mare amenable <br /> • How come the home owners are not joining in the group an the a�plicati�n? <br /> + If praject is approved and Iater th�y have crakes it� the house, who is responsibie? <br /> • If Ja�anese scale of earthquake — 9.0 — what will happen to the hames? <br /> 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.