Laserfiche WebLink
8.A. - Page 71 <br /> • In absence of Planned Development (PD) the developer wauld like a hypothetical PD for <br /> 30% sIope Iot. Five acres that includes fc�llowirig criteria <br /> • Elevations, roads, driveways, profiles. Is their proposal eve� feasible? <br /> • Bio-retention basins supposed to gafher �v�ter and dissipate graduaIly. Lat of deep <br /> water. Goring to pave 5 acres. WiII make drainage v��orse. Don't think PIaz� will work. <br /> • EIR did not adequate�y address seismic impacts <br /> + We will lose year round creek to retentioYl. Prefer naiural flow year round <br /> • Mitigation measures insufficient. Totally subjeetive <br /> 3. How cQUld ��i�c�° concerns be addressed? <br /> • 4G.7a and 4&.7b — plan shau�d follo�v City's cri#eria for number Qf units <br /> � Want City to Iook out for sa#ety of citizens. AppIy zaning laws <br /> • City provide FAR (Floor/Area/Ratio) <br /> . <br /> 4. 'What addrtr.ona7 informatian dn �ou. tzeed ahouf fhis p1�a�osal? <br /> � Who's Iiable in case of slides? Wha will pay? <br /> + Does EIR reflect slides ir� past? <br /> • Utility treneh through outcropping makes no s�nse. How c�oes trench a#fect <br /> ou�cropping? <br /> � WiII someone post a$25,OOQ,00� bond to protect homes below? <br /> • What is the development procedure? Cut? Txench? Step by step exact�y what they're <br /> going to do. <br /> • Like to un�ierstand how creek do�nli�strearn will �e affected u� normal and i1� sform <br /> con.ditiolls. <br /> • How much �n�ill the bio-rete�tion basins hold? <br /> • How �xiz�igate 10 years of eanstruc�ion traffic? <br /> Next 5teps: <br /> Mr. Jany out�i�led the next steps in the process: <br /> o Tl�e information gaihered at �his �neeti�g wiil be typed up by the PCRC sta.f� and sub�nitted <br /> to the Redwood City Planning Departrnenf. <br /> � Notes vviIl be emailed fo everyone who sup�lied email addresses an the sign- sheEt. <br /> + Notes wil� be plac�d within tihe project ix�foxmatzon file already an the web. <br /> • A public hearing date for the City Council meeting on �he appeal of the }�roject EIR will be <br /> set by the Ci�y Clerk, City Aftorney and Mayor. <br /> • Interested parties (ev�ryone who signed zn at the 3.29.11 coinmur�ity meeting, and everyone <br /> on fhe City's maiIing list in the praject file i.e. 300-foof z'adzus, plus thase who have <br /> requested notification) wiIl be nofified af the hearing date by Redwood City PIanning <br /> Services. <br /> 4 of 5 <br />