My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2011-08-22
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
AgdaPkt 2011-08-22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2012 12:02:59 PM
Creation date
8/18/2011 4:39:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
8/22/2011
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
456
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
* 8.A. - Page 91 : <br /> a ---- <br /> ` Page 9 <br /> cost. However, partiapants i�t the agreement wauld have no recourse to <br /> reco�er their costs f�r prepara�ian of the EIR from non-partiapating o�vners. <br /> A voluntary agreement would not be subject to the Reirrtk�ursement <br /> Agreement O�rdinance. <br /> C�1�CLiISIDN 'T7�ei�e a�e several finaziang aptions �vai�ab�e to fund f�e <br /> Lauxel Way EIR, i.e. a reimbursemen� agre�ment, a#radi#ionat assessment <br /> disfrict, special impravem�nt dis#rict, and voluntary agreement. However, <br /> from a practi�al standpoint, the assessrnent dis�rict, sp�ial improvement <br /> district, and reimbursement agreement op#iorts usually assume the <br /> �onatruction of unprovements which ultimately become publicly owned. For <br /> purpose� oE financing an EIR, those options are cumbersame and rela#ively <br /> expensive, uriless improvements are also going to be financed, and the �ost of <br /> the E�R is included as an incidental expense. <br /> I�ECDMMENDAx'YQN Of all the types of finanaing mechanisms, staff beiieves <br /> that the voIuntary agreement wou�d be the best, possibly with a aty <br /> contribution. It is the simples# and Ieast cumbersome ta administer. If the �ity <br /> Council decides to pay for a portion of the EIR rost, then the �ontributinn <br /> shouid �+e based on the percentage of total public right of way within �he Laurei <br /> Way Subdivisian, i.e. a rontribution of approximately $14,40D. However, even <br /> with the payment, there is na guarantee that the EIR will be cornpleted if the <br /> voluntary agreement cana�ot be finalixed among property owners. '�."here is <br /> always the chanee tha� the City could Iose its contribu�ion with no resui#, <br /> The second. best alterr€ative would be a formai r�irnbursement agreement, with <br /> possibly a city contr�butian. Hawever, such a reimbursement agr�ment <br /> requires participation of vacant prope�ty owners and is also subject to fhe <br /> regula#ians outiined i� the Reirr€bursement Agr�ement Ordinance. This <br /> c�ption would require farma� proceedings and is subject to a majority protest. <br /> FoIlowing your decision, staff wi�.i prepare a deta€�ed financ�ng plan and bring <br /> it back ta you for furth�r review which will inc�ude the opport�nity for inpu� <br /> from property owners in the �.aurel Way area. <br /> i <br /> t � ` , � � " <br /> C�d7r� /� � m � � �.. <br /> P <br /> I �� ,- <br /> Tom Passanisi Charles ]ar�� w � � Ed Everett <br /> Seniar Planner Acting Flanning�?ir�or City 1V�anager <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.