Laserfiche WebLink
� 8.A. - Page 94 ,.�_..---- �----� 6-.� F <br /> i <br /> � Page 12 <br /> � 'I r '� <br /> d <br /> � <br /> a <br /> � <br /> ; Gonacil�am �,eapxsg cxpresse� concern tha# Co�ncil su <br /> � would in fact, ef�ectively stop a.11 develapment on L�urel Way�C lm t Le'pz�tg ed <br /> � that the staff and Cauncil pmvide ather op#ions to the property ov�mers. <br /> ; Cout�cilneau Ruskim advised that the City did not have asz obligatian ta pay anythit�g <br /> ;e <br /> tovc►arc�s the EIR not �ven the � 8°to, a�d stated tha other available aptions were not likely to <br /> - happen due to their compiexities and the need for participation by so many properi3' <br /> ��. <br /> owners. <br /> �` <br /> N"layar Ha�ett sa�d the requirameat of an EIR was t�e proper pn��ic policp not only fer <br /> Laerrei Way, but in tnanq instances in the City, and said an EIR do�s nat preclude <br /> development. Mayor Hari��ett said vfllusat�r}' agreements can work, and r�rninded <br /> ; eweryone that five Laurel V�a ro � <br /> � propose rebuildirag �part of Laurel Way at a cost of $2(3U,D4a. He ded �tha.t th e ol� to <br /> a�ree�ent for an EIR described by staff appearea ta be a fair axtd equitab�e way to go. � <br /> �TERATi4N OF 'T'HE MOTTON <br /> M/S: CLAIREBUCHAN TO APPROVE STAFF RFCQ�DATfON FOR A <br /> VOLUAiTARY $PFORT TO PRODUCE AN $YR y►rlT�-i CITy p OF A <br /> MAXIMUM {�F 1 S P�RCENT �I'�RCENTAGE �k' T�TAL �UBLIC RYG�-iT Q� WAY <br /> WI'TH[N T� LAUREL WAY SUBpMS3�N) <br /> ApPROVEU BY T�E FDLLEDWING RQLL CAI,L V'D7f'�: <br /> AYES: CUUNCiL MEM$ERS BUCHAN', C '+, g0'WARD7, ItUSI�II�T A1V� <br /> 1V�,YOR HAI�TNETY` <br /> NDES: COUNCII,,�YIAN LE�ZI� <br /> M�NUTE URDE�2 No. 9�w2G7 <br /> City Atk�rney Schrieker made a recom�mendation ta the Council: "Since this is <br /> sornething of an unpreced�nteci a�ctian, if inde� the occasion does occur and we ga <br /> farward with it, I reconunend that ... any approva! for cor�tribe�f�on ts� th� ETR nat be <br /> d�emed a precedent with respect to participa�ion in any i�mprflvements #hat may occur <br /> later. (There is a) nohan of fair share and. pro rata cnt�tributians based on the are� of <br /> public properiy wit�in this region, bu# it rvou[d be' quite unprec�dented for t1�e City to <br /> cantribnte further in the context af pubii� improvements, and that cauld add up <br /> considerab�y. Sa I wou�d assume th�t context was the ttue intent of tI�e Council and you <br /> may want to staf� �at as a policy issu� w#�en it comes before yau aga�in. <br /> Mag�or .���ne� �irm� that the Council "dia maks conunents a�on� those Iines when <br /> we were discussing th� �ontribution ta roads, a�c� those commen#s would be c.�uaity <br /> appIiaable in tta.is context.> <br /> N�E1Vf� �0.29/96 <br /> ItEGU�,AR COUNCIL ME�71NCs <br /> M1NiJ'!'ES C)CTO�EIL 2$,1995 <br /> pAGE 15 <br />