Laserfiche WebLink
oaizzizo>> " <br /> controller, the State Controller, and the State Department of Finance if the city has <br /> determined not to participate in the Alternative Voluntary Redevelopment Program or if the <br /> City has not yet made such a determination; and <br /> WHEREAS, on July 18, 2011, the League of California Cities and the California <br /> Redevelopment Association and others filed a petition on behalf of cities, counties and <br /> redevelopment agencies asking the California Supreme Court to overturn AB 1X 26 and <br /> AB 1X 27; and <br /> WHEREAS, on August 11, 2011, the California Supreme Court agreed to hear the <br /> petition and issued a partial stay of enforcement of AB 1X 26 and AB 1X 27; and <br /> WHEREAS, the partial stay of enforcement has raised questions as to the actions <br /> the City and Agency can still take pursuant to AB 1X 26 and AB 1X 27; and <br /> WHEREAS, the City intends to but will not have adopted by September 1, 2011,an <br /> ordinance agreeing to comply with the Alternative Voluntary Redevelopment Program if a <br /> final determination is made upholding AB 1X 26 and AB 1X 27; and <br /> WHEREAS, the Agency has prepared the Enforceable Obligations Payment <br /> Schedule, attached hereto as Exhibit A; and <br /> WHEREAS, the Enforceable Obligation Payment Schedule contains the project <br /> name, payee, description of the obligation, payment amounts obligated for all of FY <br /> 2011/12, and by month through December 2011; and <br /> WHEREAS, Agency and City staff have reviewed the various obligations of the <br /> Agency and determined the obligations that are enforceable obligations as defined in the <br /> AB1X 26; and <br /> ATTY/Reso2154,(RDA) Enforceable Obligations Payment Schetlule � RD RESO. # 11-07 <br /> 081711 MUFF # 401 <br /> 2 <br />