Laserfiche WebLink
6.3.A. - Page 2 <br />On July 18, 2011, the California Redevelopment Association, the League of California <br />Cities and others filed a Petition for Writ of Mandate in the Supreme Court of the State <br />of California (California Redevelopment Association, et al. v. Ana Matosantos, et al., <br />Case No. 5194861), challenging the constitutionality of the companion bills, the <br />Dissolution Act and the Voluntary Program Act, on behalf of cities, counties and <br />redevelopment agencies, and requesting a stay of their enforcement. <br />A partial stay of enforcement of the companion bills has been granted by the California <br />Supreme Court and later modified. The partial stay continues to prohibit RDAs from <br />taking on any new obligations or engaging in any RDA activities (other than meeting <br />prior enforceable obligations) on or after the effective date of the companion bills, but in <br />an abundance of caution, it is recommended that the City continue to take certain <br />actions to comply with the Voluntary Program Act and to ensure that the <br />Redevelopment Agency of the City of Redwood City ( "Agency ") remains in existence, <br />should the stay be lifted and the companion bills be upheld as valid and constitutional. <br />In order to protect the City, the proposed ordinance, agreement and resolution all <br />preserve the City's right to challenge the legality of the Dissolution Act and Voluntary <br />Program Act, provide that the ordinance, agreement and resolution will not be effective <br />until the court stay is lifted, and states that any Remittance payment will be made under <br />protest. The City will not be obligated to make any Remittance for the duration of the <br />stay; nor will the Agency have any obligation to provide any portion of tax increment to <br />the City for any Remittance. Additionally, if the Dissolution Act and Voluntary Program <br />Act are invalidated by the court, the ordinance will be invalidated and the resolution and <br />agreement will be ineffective. <br />Once the court stay is lifted, the suspension is lifted and the City and Agency may take <br />any actions necessary to ensure that the Agency can resume its activities under the <br />current California Redevelopment Law, including ratifying the actions proposed and <br />recommended by this staff report. <br />By adoption of the ordinance, the City elects to participate in the Alternative Voluntary <br />Redevelopment Program, if validated. While the Ordinance commits the City to make <br />the Remittance, the Voluntary Program Act allows the City and the Agency to enter into <br />the Reimbursement Agreement whereby the Agency agrees to transfer a portion of its <br />tax increment revenue to the City, in an amount not to exceed the annual Remittance, <br />so that the City's general fund is not obligated. In addition, for Fiscal Year 2011 -12 <br />only, the Agency is exempted from the 20 percent housing set -aside requirement if the <br />Agency adopts a resolution finding that those funds are necessary to meet its debt <br />obligations, including those under the Remittance Agreement. <br />z <br />