Laserfiche WebLink
7.A. - Page 2 <br /> regulatory issues associated with banning or allowing medical marijuana collectives <br /> within City limits. The moratorium will expire on December 10, 2011. <br /> Since the moratorium was implemented, staff has researched the legal, public safety, <br /> and land use aspects of regulating medical marijuana, monitored changes in applicable <br /> law, and studied ordinances adopted by other cities regulating medical marijuana <br /> distribution facilities. <br /> Staff recommends the adoption of Article 59 of the Zoning Ordinance to prohibit medical <br /> marijuana distribution facilities for these reasons, explained more fully below: <br /> 1. There is continuing uncertainty between state and federal enforcement policies that <br /> could further complicate local enforcement efforts; <br /> 2. Based on the recent proliferation of inedical marijuana facilities and associated law <br /> enforcement problems, staff anticipates an increase in crime and crime-related <br /> secondary impacts of these facilities operating in the City; <br /> 3. Land use concerns could result from medical marijuana distribution facilities, namely <br /> neighborhood compatibility and traffic; and <br /> 4. Significant staff costs and time would be anticipated to ensure that medical <br /> marijuana distribution facilities meet state and City requirements. Although permit <br /> and regulatory fees could be assessed, enactment of those fees may not cover the <br /> full cost of enforcement or may be at the expense of other priority activities. <br /> At its September 20, 2011 meeting, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public <br /> hearing on this amendment. The Commission voted unanimously to recommend the <br /> proposed Zoning Ordinance amendment to the Council including an optional sunset <br /> provision, which would require the City to re-evaluate this issue in 2 years before the <br /> specified sunset date, November 24, 2013. Refer to draft Minutes from the September <br /> 20, 2011 Planning Commission meeting in Attachment 3. <br /> Upon consideration of the Planning Commission's recommendation to establish a <br /> sunset clause, staff recommends adopting the ordinance without such a clause. Staff <br /> recommends this alternative because it sends a clearer message as to the City's intent <br /> regarding the distribution of inedical marijuana. Should there become clarity in the law, <br /> as discussed further in this report, the City Council has the discretion to take up this <br /> matter at any time in the future as necessary. A sunset clause would require that this <br /> issue be re-examined within a certain timeframe opposed to letting it be at Council's <br /> discretion. <br /> ANALYSIS <br /> Legal Assessment <br /> Potential Conflict Between Federal Criminal Law and State Criminal Law: <br /> The Federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA) makes it illegal to import, manufacture, <br /> distribute, possess or use marijuana in the United States. Because the federal <br /> government classifies marijuana as a "Schedule I" controlled substance, marijuana <br /> cannot be prescribed or dispensed in the same way as legal drugs, which is why <br />