Laserfiche WebLink
7. B. - Page 10 <br />Executive Summary <br />1! <br />GlIY <br />qW <br />`wflj(RG 9 6 e WJft LCr&d <br />ES.6 KEY TECHNICAL FINDINGS (CHAPTERS 5,6 AND 7) <br />In summary, the technical evaluations identified the following key findings: <br />• System Capacity and Operational Evaluation: While the City's existing distribution <br />system storage is adequate for normal operational needs, there is a need for additional <br />storage in both the Hillside Area and the Main City Zone to meet emergency and fire <br />flow needs. Thus, the City's highest priority capacity projects are new storage <br />projects to address fire flow and emergency needs in the Hillside Area and Main City <br />Zone. <br />• Seismic Vulnerability Assessment: The City's tank and pump station facilities are at <br />risk from seismic events due to the City's proximity to the San Andreas Fault. A <br />number of existing seismic vulnerabilities can be addressed through relatively low <br />capital expenditures. Of the City's 12 tanks, three will need major rehabilitation to <br />address seismic vulnerabilities, and three tanks will require eventual replacement. <br />These projects are included in the Pipeline and Facility Renewal and Replacement <br />Program. <br />• Pipeline and Facility Renewal and Replacement: The City has aging, but generally <br />well maintained infrastructure. Pipeline replacements should, at a minimum, continue <br />at existing rates. However, an increased replacement schedule is recommended to <br />improve risk management. To address aging tank and pump station facilities, the City <br />should continue its tank and pump station rehabilitation program and plan for longer - <br />term replacement of tanks. <br />These findings are discussed in greater detail below. <br />ES.6.1 System Capacity and Operational Reliability Assessment <br />The system analysis evaluated facilities and pipeline performance, assessing system now and <br />pressure for normal and emergency operations, and system redundancy and reliability. The <br />analysis evaluated the existing system under both current demands and 2030 demands. <br />A computerized, calibrated hydraulic model of the City water distribution system was developed <br />from the City's GIS for the technical evaluation. Three programs (Capacity and Operational <br />(CAP) -1, 2 and 3) were formulated to address existing system needs, and one program <br />(CAP -FU) was developed to address needs for future growth. Table ES -2 summarizes key <br />programs developed for the System CAP Evaluation: <br />WEST Y O S T ASSOCIATES ES-6 City of Redwood City <br />September 2011 Water System Master Plan <br />o \c \369 \06- 09- 01 \wp \mp \052610_OES <br />