My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2011-10-24
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
AgdaPkt 2011-10-24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2011 4:21:39 PM
Creation date
10/20/2011 1:24:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
10/24/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
182
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6.2.E. - Page 6 <br />9. Multiple Record Owners or Customers of Record. <br />A. Each record owner or customer of record of a parcel served by the City may <br />submit a protest. This includes instances where: <br />(i) A parcel is owned by more than a single record owner or more than <br />one name appears on the City's records as the customer of record <br />for the parcel, or <br />(ii) A customer of record is not the record owner, or <br />(iii) A parcel includes more than one record customers, or <br />(iv) Multiple parcels are served via a single utility account, as master - <br />metered multiple family residential units. <br />B. Only one protest will be counted per parcel as provided by Government Code <br />section 53755(b). <br />10. Transparency, Confidentiality, and Disclosure. <br />A. To ensure transparency and accountability in the fee protest tabulation <br />while protecting the privacy rights of record owners and customers of <br />record, protests will be maintained in confidence until tabulation begins <br />following the public hearing. <br />B. Once a protest is opened during the tabulation, it becomes a disclosable <br />public record, as required by state law. <br />TABULATION OF PROTESTS <br />11. City Clerk. <br />The City Clerk shall not accept as valid any protest if he or she determines that <br />any of the following is true: <br />A. The protest does not state its opposition to the proposed charges <br />B. The protest does not name the record owner or record customer of the <br />parcel identified in the protest as of the date of the public hearing. <br />C. The protest does not identify a parcel served by the City which is subject <br />to the proposed charge. <br />D. The protest does not bear an original signature of the named record <br />owner of, or record customer with respect to, the parcel identified on the <br />protest. Whether a signature is valid shall be entrusted to the reasonable <br />judgment of the City Clerk, who may consult signatures on file with the <br />County Elections Official and /or the City. <br />ATTY /RESO /Reso. 2169 Prop 218 Protest <br />101311 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.