My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
MO 1984 1-150 1/10/84 to 9/7/84
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minute Orders
>
1980-1989 (partial)
>
1984 (partial)
>
MO 1984 1-150 1/10/84 to 9/7/84
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/4/2012 4:47:06 PM
Creation date
1/4/2012 4:46:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minute Order
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/10/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
189
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• o <br /> �- MINUTE ORDER <br /> N0: 84-133 <br /> CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT <br /> Redwood City <br /> DATE: August 14, 1984 <br /> Attention: City Manager <br /> City Attorney <br /> Director of Public Works <br /> Planning Director <br /> Traffic Engineer <br /> SUBJECT: Conditional Variance - 2215 E1 Camino Real/Chevron (203-05) <br /> Meeting of the Council of the City of Redwood City on August 6, 1984 <br /> Present: Councilmen Bury, Chandler, Claire, Rhodes, Stangel, and Vice Mayor <br /> Nbsher <br /> Absent: Mayor Britschgi <br /> The following motion was made and entered on the minutes: <br /> M/S: Claire/Stangel to approve the request of Robert H. Lee & Associates for <br /> Conditional Variance for a 41-foot driveway width for Chevron Self-Serve/Mini <br /> Market, 2215 E1 Camino Real subject to the conditions contained in the Report <br /> of the City Manager of August 2, 1984, with the finding being made that <br /> strict application of the provisions of Redwood City Code Section 29.19 would <br /> create practical difficulty or unnecessary hardships in that the driveway <br /> width specified in Section 29.19 would: <br /> 1) create traffic congestion on E1 Camino real and enhance the probabilities <br /> of rear-end type collisions on the street; <br /> 2) create blockage of vehicles on the subject premises, likewise enhancing <br /> the probability of collision; and <br /> 3) as a result of the conditions described under (a) and (b) above, would <br /> create an unnecessary hardship upon the applicant by ultimately <br /> discouraging a use permitted for the property under the Zoning Ordinance. <br /> Carried unanimously by voice vote. <br /> C L NE C. HILDEBRAND <br /> Ci Clerk <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.