My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2012-01-09
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
AgdaPkt 2012-01-09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2012 1:23:44 PM
Creation date
1/5/2012 4:46:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
1/9/2012
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
461
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
To the Board of Directors 6.1. B. - Page 158 <br /> of the City of Pedwood City Pedevelopnlent Agency <br /> Pedwood City, California <br /> Page2 <br /> Accounting principles generally accepted in t11e United States of America require that t11e <br /> nlanagenlent's discussion and analysis and budgetary conlparison ulfornlation on pages 3 through 8 <br /> and 40 tllrougll 42 be presented to supplenlent t11e basic financial statements. Such information, <br /> although not a part of t11e basic financial statenlents, is required by the Governnlental Accounting <br /> Standards Board, who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic <br /> fiilancial statenlents u1 an appropriate operational, econonuc, or historical context. We have applied <br /> certain linuted procedures to the required supplementary i�lformation in accordance with auditing <br /> staildards generally accepted in the United States of Ainerica, which consisted of ulquiries of <br /> management about the methods of preparulg the information and comparing tlle infornlation for <br /> consistency wit11 management's responses to our ulquiries, the basic financial statements, and other <br /> knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statenlents. We do not express an <br /> opinion or provide any assurance on the infornlation because the lu7uted procedures do not provide <br /> us with sufficient evidence to express an opulion or provide any assurance. <br /> Our audit was conducted for the purpose of fornlulg opulions on the fulancial statements fllat <br /> collectively conlprise the Agency's financial statenlents as a wllole. T11e budgetary conlparison <br /> infornlation for the 2003 Tax Allocation Bonds fund and excess surplus calculation are presented for <br /> purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of tlle fulancial statements. The budgetary <br /> conlparison infornlation for fl1e 2003 Tax Allocation Bonds fund and excess surplus calculation are the <br /> responsibility of nlanagenlent and were derived from and relate directly to the underlying accounting <br /> and otller records used to prepare t11e financial statements. T11e uzformation has been subjected to the <br /> auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements aild certauz additional <br /> procedures, including conlparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlyuzg <br /> accounting and other records used to prepare tlle fiilancial statenlents or to the financial stateineilts <br /> themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance wit11 auditing standards generally <br /> accepted u1 the United States of America. In our opinion, tlle ulformation is fairly stated in all nlaterial <br /> respects in relation to fl1e fulancial statenlents as a whole. <br /> � �c�. � f��'�-`� �'� . <br /> � <br /> Caporicci & Larson, Inc. <br /> A Subsidiary of Marcum LLP <br /> Certified Public Accountants <br /> San Francisco, California <br /> December 7, 2011 <br /> � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.