My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2012-01-09
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
AgdaPkt 2012-01-09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2012 1:23:44 PM
Creation date
1/5/2012 4:46:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
1/9/2012
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
461
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6.1. B. - Page 17 <br /> State of California <br /> As part of the 2011-12 State budget package, the California Legislature enacted and the Governor signed two <br /> companion bills addressing redevelopment, AB1x 26 ("Dissolution Act") and AB1x 27 ("Voluntary Program Act"), <br /> which took effect on June 29, 2011. <br /> The Dissolution Act, which is discussed more fully below, immediately suspended all new redevelopment activities <br /> and incurrence of indebtedness, and eliminates redevelopment agencies as of October 1, 2011. <br /> The Voluntary Program Act, which is discussed more fully below, allows the community that created the <br /> redevelopment agency to avoid dissolution by opting to pay a substantial community remittance ("Remittance") <br /> beginning FY 2011/12 and each year thereafter. If all communities with redevelopment agencies opt in to the <br /> Voluntary Program Act, the total statewide remittance would be $1.7 billion in FY 2011/12. Remittance each <br /> succeeding year would be approximately $400 million statewide. If Redwood City opts in to the Voluntary <br /> Program Act, the FY 2011/12 payment is $4.9 million and each subsequent year is approximately $1.16 million <br /> based on preliminary estimates by the California Redevelopment Association. Biannual payments would be due by <br /> January 15 and May 15 of each year. <br /> On July 18, 2011, the California Redevelopment Association, the League of California Cities, and others filed a <br /> Petition for Writ of Mandate in the Supreme Court of the State of California (California Redevelopment <br /> Association, et al. v. Ana Matosantos, et al., Case No. 5194861), challenging the constitutionality of the companion <br /> bills, the Dissolution Act and the Voluntary Program Act, on behalf of cities, counties and redevelopment agencies, <br /> and requesting a stay of their enforcement. <br /> As of the date of this report, a partial stay of enforcement of the companion bills has been granted by the <br /> California Supreme Court. The partial stay continues to prohibit redevelopment agencies from taking on any new <br /> obligations or engaging in any redevelopment agency activities (other than meeting prior enforceable obligations) <br /> on or after the effective date of the companion bills, but it is unclear whether cities may still adopt opt-in <br /> ordinances during the stay. <br /> Downtown Parking Operations <br /> With the opening of the downtown cinema/retail complex in 2006 along with the 590 space underground parking <br /> garage that is owned and operated by the City, the parking enterprise fund that was formerly financially self- <br /> sufficient now requires an annual subsidy from the City. In FY 2011/12 the City expects to transfer $637,000 from <br /> the general fund to the parking fund to support the parking fund's operations. The length of time that this subsidy <br /> continues and the extent to which it continues are a function of how quickly paid parl<ing activity in the downtown <br /> area increases and whether such increased demand will justify increased parl<ing fees. It is expected that some <br /> level of general fund financial support to the parking fund will be required for the indefinite future. <br /> Sales Taxes <br /> Sales tax is critical general fund revenue as it accounts for about 18% of total general fund revenues. As the local <br /> economy slowly recovers from the 2007 recession, sales tax revenue is beginning to reflect this recovery <br /> increasing 4.3% from FY 2009/10. Most of this increase was attributable to increased sales at department stores <br /> and new car sales. <br /> The City continues to rely heavily on sales tax generated by businesses engaged in selling software. A threat to <br /> this revenue stream is the progressive migration of businesses delivering software to their customers <br /> electronically (via lnternet download or over dedicated phone lines) which then, under regulations adopted by the <br /> State of California Board of Equalization, provides that such products are no longer subject to sales tax. <br /> In FY 2010/11 the City continues to experience a decline in sales tax derived from business-to-business <br /> transactions with revenues from this sector dropping almost 10%from the prior year. <br /> iii <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.