Laserfiche WebLink
8. B. - Page 1 <br /> RE PO RT <br /> To the Honorable Mayor and City Council <br /> From the City Manager <br /> January 9, 2012 <br /> SUBJECT <br /> An Ordinance Adding Division 5.5, Sections 3.93 through 3.96, of Chapter 3 to the <br /> Redwood City Code Relating to Modification of Sign Regulations <br /> RECOMMENDATION <br /> Waive First Reading and Introduce an Ordinance Adding a New Division 5.5, Sections <br /> 3.93 through 3.96, of Chapter 3 to the Redwood City Code Relating to Modification of <br /> Sign Regulations. <br /> BACKGROUND <br /> The proposed ordinance will create consistency within the City's sign regulations. All <br /> development requires a permit. If a development is outside a precise plan, the <br /> developer must obtain a Planned Development Permit (PDP). Under the City's sign <br /> ordinance, the developer of a PDP can apply for variations (modifications) from the <br /> City's sign regulations and it will be allowed if certain findings can be made. <br /> If a development is within a precise plan, the developer must obtain a Planned <br /> Community Permit (PCP). The precise plan may set forth the sign regulations, which is <br /> the case with the Downtown Precise Plan. However, the City's other precise plans <br /> generally refer back to and incorporate the City's sign regulations as set forth in the <br /> City's sign ordinance. However, unlike the PDP, there is no parallel structure for PCPs <br /> that allow a developer to apply for variations (modifications) from the sign ordinance. <br /> This ordinance corrects that deficiency by providing a parallel process with similar <br /> findings required for approving signs and granting modifications to the sign regulations. <br /> The required findings to grant a modification are as follows: <br /> 1. The proposed sign program, as a whole conforms to the purposes and objectives <br /> of the Sign Ordinance and any applicable Precise Plan; <br /> 2. The sign is in harmony with the character of the surrounding neighborhood or <br /> district; <br /> 3. The quality exceeds the standards typically required; <br /> 4. The proposed sign will not be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals or <br /> general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood or be <br />