Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTE ORDER <br /> <br /> CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />February 27, 1995 <br />MO. 95-043 <br />CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT <br />Redwood City <br /> <br />DATE: February 28, 1995 <br /> <br />Attention: City Manager <br /> City Attorney <br /> Community Development Director <br /> Planning Director <br /> <br />SUBJECT: Development Agreement with Westport Investments (109) <br /> <br />Meeting of the Council of the City of Redwood City on February 27, 1995 <br /> <br />Present: Councilmembers Buehan, Hartnett, Howard, La Berge, Sanfilipo, Steinfeld <br /> and Mayor Gasparini <br /> <br />Absent: None <br /> <br />The following motion was made and entered on the Minutes: <br /> <br /> Item No. 6. I)ireetor Patterson stated that the City Attorney recommended the <br /> clause "and the acceptance thereof not unreasonably withheld" be removed due <br /> to its ambiguity in that it implies the Council will accept improvements if offers <br /> are made. City Attorney Sehrieker advised that the substitute language is in <br /> the second letter dated February 27, 1995, but the major objection is the <br /> developer wants "which offers shall be promptly considered and not <br /> unreasonably withheld." City Attorney Schricker advised that it would have <br /> been preferable to specifiy what would be private and what would be public at <br /> the front end of the agreement, but both parties were too far down a different <br /> path to rewrite the agreement in that manner. <br /> <br /> CONSENSUS: Mayor Gasparini declared it was the consensus of the Council <br /> to accept the recommendation in City Attorney Schricker's letter of February <br /> 27, 1995, to leave the paragraph in and delete the last four words "and not <br /> <br />City Clerk <br /> <br /> <br />