My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CCMin 2011-08-22
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
CCMin 2011-08-22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2012 4:01:05 PM
Creation date
1/19/2012 4:01:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
8/22/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Julie Hansen said she has lived on Highland Avenue since 1982 and the traffic has <br /> gotten worse with cars squealing and almost hitting one another and she noted that <br /> there had been a fatality there when a commuter skidded on watery pavement and hit a <br /> resident while she was getting her mail. She spoke in opposition to the project and <br /> opined that the road is not safe on sunny days and horrendous during rainy days with <br /> people not stopping when going down the hill. <br /> Frank Kabiri said he is against the project. <br /> Sergio Nibbi said he and his brother own one of lots in question. He said that around <br /> 1945 their father and uncle bought two lots at the end of Laurel Way, which was a dirt <br /> road, and they lived there over 60 years waiting for a house to be built there. He opined <br /> that homes can be built there without great difficulty, and is a benefit to the City in the <br /> form of more in property taxes, and he hopes for beautiful homes, improved roads, and <br /> increased safe ty with more stop signs. <br /> Bob Cervenka spoke in support of project, against the appeal, and he noted that his son <br /> is one of landowners who are a longtime resident living within sight of this project. He <br /> said the home was annexed into Redwood City in 1969, the parcel sizes are consistent <br /> for that area, and these homes will be higher quality and would be a win-win. He opined <br /> the project will clean up the garbage at the site and benefit the City. <br /> Oder Haner spoke about the CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) language <br /> and noted that section 1524 of the Act does not require the lead agency to conduct <br /> every test. He said they have had the four best geologists in the area telling them this <br /> project is more than feasible and he quoted sections of CEQA. <br /> Lieu Nguyen was not present when called. <br /> Karen Cervenka said her son owns a parcel on Laurel Way that was annexed by <br /> Redwood City in 1969, and that when he purchased it, he was told that he could not <br /> build on it without this EIR. She spoke about benefits this project would bring to the <br /> City, such as prevention of illegal dumping, and she also noted that her son could be <br /> bought out if there is a desire to preserve it as open space. <br /> Brian Cervenka said he is one lot owners, was born and raised in Redwood City, and <br /> has fond memories of area. He wants to make clear that when lots went up for sale, the <br /> previous neighbors knew it would eventually be built on, but it seems they do not want it <br /> now that they have their own homes. <br /> Michelle Ross opposes this development and she owns three lots, one with a home and <br /> two that are adjacent that are not buildable because they are nonconforming, <br /> nonstandard, highly sloped, and the existing zoning regulations do not allow it. She <br /> spoke about the heritage trees, that she is not against development, just this one and <br /> the way iYs proposed, and mentioned a website called "Save Laurel Way." <br /> JOINT CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD August 22, 2011 <br /> MEETING MINUTES PAGE 14 <br /> MINUTE BOOK NO. 63 <br /> Page No. 386 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.