My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Resolution PC 96-1 Flatirons Funding
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Planning Commission
>
1996
>
Resolution PC 96-1 Flatirons Funding
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2012 6:18:38 PM
Creation date
1/19/2012 6:06:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Date
6/19/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
vicinity of the Project. Any other air traffic control conflict that results in a go- <br />around or an ear right turn could also be affected by the height o f the buildings. <br />FindinLs The City .hereby makes finding ( 1 )= <br />Fein Support of Findin s10 <br />(a) For Runway .3 0 departures, the slower aircraft would be turned prior to <br />reaching n the diamond- shaped waterway; an this case, the.. ircraft required to turn <br />early could directly overfly the l'rvj ect site. Even the lowest performing aircraft <br />in the San Carlos fleet has .a normal rate of climb that would result in the aircraft <br />overflying the 10 -story building at an altitude of approximately 600 feet MSL, or <br />about 450 feet above the top of the building. <br />( b) When a high aircraft is required to `ego around," the aircraft on <br />go -around may turn early to re eater the pattern. This could place it in the <br />vicinity of the Project. The pilot either would follow air traffic control <br />instructions, 'which wo uld ensure that the plane avoided project bu ildings, o <br />would follow p ublished instructions, which would normally require the plane to <br />continue straight ahead, parallel to the runway. Under such conditions, the <br />airplane would not come close to the 10 -story building. <br />3.10.12 Potential Effect; The safety of the individuals inhabiting the buildings, <br />es p eciall y the ten office building, could be affected by aircraft overflight. <br />The density of occupancy could result in safety concerns. <br />Finding Th City .hereby finales finding (1). <br />Facts in Support of Endings <br />(a) The Airport .Study carefully reviews FAA airport safety guidelines. The <br />Airport Study concludes that the Project will not conflict with the FAA Object <br />Free Area or Runway Safety Area. <br />(b ) The Airport Study also concludes that the Project will .not conflict with <br />the Runway protection Zones (RPZ whether existing or potential :(as depicted <br />on the current Airport Land Use Plan and approved by the FAA and Caltr <br />Aeronautics .Pro am ). The RPZ is intended to enhance the protection of people <br />and roP� nt e on the ground from aircraft either lanng short of the runway or <br />p <br />overrunning the runway end on take -off. <br />( c) In 1983 Redwood Shores, Inc. voluntarily reduced heights of buildings <br />within two flight corridors at Shan Carlos. Airport to 50 feet above ground level (60 <br />..2. <br />DNGF1 -noc <br />5130196.10:51 AM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.