My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Resolution PC 96-1 Flatirons Funding
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Planning Commission
>
1996
>
Resolution PC 96-1 Flatirons Funding
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2012 6:18:38 PM
Creation date
1/19/2012 6:06:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Date
6/19/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
more written findings f or each of those signif cant effects, accompanied b <br />a brief explanation of the rationa .e ..for each finding. The findings are: <br />Changes or alterations have been required in, o incorporated into, <br />the project which avoid or substantial) lessen the significant <br />�' <br />environmental effect as identified in the anal EIS. <br />This finding shall be referred to as "Finding (I)Off <br />( 2) Such ch anges or alterations are wi thin the responsibility and <br />jurisdiction of another public .agency and not the a enc makin the <br />g y g <br />finding. Such changes have been adopted by s uch other agency or <br />can and should. be- adopted by such other agency. <br />Th�s Ending shall be referred to .as "Finding (2),+' <br />(3) Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible <br />the mitigatio n measures or proj ect alternatives identified in the <br />Final EIR.. <br />This .finding s d. Was be referre as ►Finding (3)1. <br />1.3 O Eganization of This Document <br />Section .2 of this document identifies the significant environmental effects of the <br />Project that cannot feasibly be mitigated to b e low .a level of significance. Section 3 <br />identifies potential environmental effects of the Project that are n# si 'fcant bec <br />gni ause of <br />the design of the Project or because they can feasibl y be tniti g aced to below a level of <br />significance. Section .4 summarizes the alternatives discussed in the EIR and makes <br />endings with respect to their feasibility nd whether the alternatives. would <br />� lessen the <br />significant environmental effects of the Proj ect. Section 5 consists of the Statement ternent of <br />Overri ding Considerations. Section 6 sets forth the City finding that the Project . EIR <br />j <br />reflects the Cm's independent judgment Pub. Res Code, § 2.1082. 1). <br />.2 *0 FMINGS.REGARDING SIGNMCANT EFFECTS THAT CANNOT. <br />. <br />FEASIBLY BE MIGATED To BELOW A LEVIEL of SIGNMCA'GE <br />The City has determined that the adoption of feasible mitigation measures, <br />alternatives and proposals incorporated into the Pro' ect will not reduce the Boilo owing <br />g <br />impacts to below a level �f significance. <br />2- <br />FNDNGPI .DOC <br />5/30/9610:51 Ali <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.