AgdaPkt 2012-01-23 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

6.1. C. - Page 15 Section 5— Economic Analysis: a cost comparison of alternatives considered and economic analysis of the proposed Title XVI proj ect relative to other water supply alternatives that could be implemented by the City. Section 6— Justification of why the proposed proj ect was the selected alternative. A memo that explains the distribution alternative selection process will be prepared. Task A.4 — Le�al and Institutional Requi�ements The Title XVI Feasibility Study (Section 8) shall identify any legal or institutional requirements or barriers to implementing the proposed Title XVI project. WBA will identify potential institutional issues that may need to be addressed and review them with the City, as well as discuss with the City any additional issues that may need to be identified in the Feasibility Study. Task A. S— Additional Topics As part of the USBR WaterSMART grant that is funding a portion of the Feasibility Study, Redwood City agreed to provide the following information in the Feasibility Study, which is in addition to the D&S requirements. • Analyze the potential for the proj ect to a) improve the quality of surface or groundwater; b) improve flow conditions of natural stream channels; c) to provide water or habitat for threatened or endangered species. • Address methods to incorporate the use of renewable energy or otherwise address energy efficiency aspects of the proj ect. • How proj ect will promote and apply a regional or watershed perspective to water resource management. Task A. 6— Financial Capabilitv Section 9 of the D&S focuses on the ability and willingness of the City to pay for the construction, operation and maintenance costs of the proj ect. This scope and budget assumes that City staff will prepare the financial plan for the proj ect, which includes an analysis of how the City will pay for construction and annual operation, maintenance and replacement costs. WBA will prepare a summary memo of the financial plan tailored to the D&S requirements. Task A. 7— P�epa�e C�osswalk anc� Executive Summa�v WBA will build upon the work started in Task A.2 by adding the information and supporting materials generated in Tasks A.3 -A.6. An executive summary that describes the proj ect and summarizes the information contained in the crosswalk will be prepared. This task assumes an administrative draft will be prepared for City review. Based on City comments, the Draft Report will be prepared and submitted to USBR. The Draft will be revised based upon USBR comments and finalized. Task A. 8— P�olect Mana�ement and Communication WBA will collect and integrate the information prepared by the consultant team and City staff. WBA will remain in regular contact with City staff and team members to obtain and request the information needed to complete the report. Monthly proj ect team calls are anticipated. WBA Agreement over $10K 12 City Attorney Approved Version 091211