My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Resolution PC 96-2 Flatirons Funds (2)
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Planning Commission
>
1996
>
Resolution PC 96-2 Flatirons Funds (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2012 9:25:35 AM
Creation date
1/23/2012 9:23:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Date
6/19/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />Airport. Business and professional uses are considered compatible with <br />noise levels up to CNEL 70 dB. <br />(21 Safety Obj ective 1 states "Protect the community from the hazards of soil <br />erosion, weals and expansive soils, and geologic instability." The :Project is <br />consistent with this requirement. The Planned Development Permit <br />includes a condition requiring the applicant to comply with all <br />recommendations of the geotechnical report on file with the Building <br />Division. Comp l iance with these requirements will reduce seismic risk. <br />The geotechnical report for the Project includes recommendations regarding <br />settlement. The Planned Development Permit requires the applicant to <br />comply with all recommendations of the geotechnical report. Settlement is <br />not uniqu to the Project site; it ten to .accompany most projects that are <br />built upon recently - placed fill. The geotechnical report prepared for the <br />Project concludes that soil and geotechnical conditions at the s to are <br />suitable for the p roposed development. The geotechnical conditions at the <br />site are similar to those at other properties in the vicinity which have been <br />successfully developed. <br />(22) Safety objective 4 states "Protect the safety of people on the ground and <br />in aircraft in fl ight in the vicinity of San Carlos Airport." In order to <br />ensure that the Project is consistent with this policy, the City <br />conurnissioned an Airport Land Use and Safety Study, prepared by P &D <br />Consultants, Inc. The Airport Study concludes that ` =[t]he proposed <br />Project would be :compatible with the safe and efficient operation of San <br />Carlos Airport within the range of allowable .airport operating conditions <br />and existing noise, safety, airspace protection, or overflight criteria. It <br />would not subject people or property on the ground to undue or excessive <br />risk from potential aircraft accidents or noise, nor would it pose . a <br />demonstrated risk to .the . safety of aircraft in flight." The evidence <br />contained in the Airp ort.Study supports this c The findings and <br />facts in supp of fi contained in Section 3.10 of the CEQA <br />findings hereby are incorporated by reference. <br />.(23) Safety Policy S. -12 states "regulate land uses surrounding airports to <br />assure airport safety." The Project is consistent with the San Mateo <br />County Comprehensive Airport Land Use � P "). The CLUP is <br />a comprehensive land use plan that was enacted in order to ensure <br />compatible landuse.in the areas surrounding airports. The CLUP <br />establishes a max imurn height for structures in the Project area of 1 feet. <br />No structure in the Project will exceed 152 feet in height. Therefore, the <br />Project is consistent with the CLUP height requirements. In 1983 <br />Redwood Shores, Inc.. voluntarily reduced heights of buildings Within two <br />EAGPLNP LDOC <br />5130/96 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.