Laserfiche WebLink
8. B. - Page 94 <br /> etnissia��s of 10.1�6. Accc�rdi��g to C[arlc's initial ca�culations, residen��al <br /> receptors would b� exposed to 'TAC emissions of I2.707. The threshold <br /> o�signi.�canc� adopted by the City is IO i�� 1 millian.� Therefore, by both <br /> BAAQNID and Clar[c's calculat�ans, the Projecf would cause a significant <br /> impact to resideniiaE .rece�afors. <br /> The City relied on a re���ed ana.[ysis to conclude that the exposure risk �ar <br /> fu�ure resEdents durir�g Praject apez°atiara wo�ld €�e 9.� in I lnillion, just. 0.6 <br /> below the thresl�o(d of significance. Cfarlc's ca�nments on the Draft EIR <br /> ide��ti#ied speci�c faiIures witk� t��e City's re�ned analysis, wllich Eed to an <br /> u�lderes�irr�ation of ti�� Peaject's �m}�acts a�� future f•esideB3tia1 recep�ors. <br /> TI�� City� disrtzissed Clark's can � by saying that Ciar[c us�d <br /> an i.tacor�•ect cat�cc�• ris�C adjustn�ent factor, expass�re d€�i°ati�n for year 0 <br /> and �reat��ing rate. <br /> As discussed in t�ese co�n�nents, tl�e City's �as not properly cansiderecE <br /> the speci�c flaws in tE�e r�fined a�3alysis. Its respo��se to co�aa�x�ents <br /> dismisses C[ark's and the BAAQMD'S Fndi��gs, witl�out explaini�a� or <br /> just�fyir�g t�se faulty i�sethodnlogy used. It is C',lark's api��ion t��at the T.A,G <br /> emissions fron� F1 Camino Real wi11 E�ave a significant it�tpact Qn �he <br /> Praject's residentia� receptars. <br /> ` DE3R, pP. 78, 79. <br /> Page 2 of 8 <br />