Laserfiche WebLink
8. B. - Page 15 <br /> Silvia Vonderizz�.�en <br /> Dece�nber �9, 2011 <br /> �'age 2 <br /> submi�ted writt�n and supple�r�ental writt�n co�men�s or� i;he Project's Final EIR <br /> to the Planning Comxnisszo�. These comments pravide the �asis for this appeal az�d <br /> d�mons�:ra.te that �he City f�iled to cornp�y with thc require�n�nt,s of C�QA.. <br /> S�ecifically, �;he City failed to include zn the EIR an accu3°a�e de�crip�ion of the <br /> �nvironznental setting, an analysis of all Pxoject impacts and �'easible miti�ai�iar� <br /> measures requi�ed to reduce impacts to a�ess than signif�can� l�v�l. �n addition, <br /> th� Ci�;y failed f:o provide good faith, r�aso�ec� res�onses to our° comrr�ents. We have <br /> attach�d our co�nments, which set forth �he g�ouz�ds for this appeal, as A�tachm�nts <br /> A, B and C. <br /> This app�al is a�so based on the City's f'azlure �a ensure tha� the Praject <br /> approva�s pr.ovide good jobs and affordable ho�szng in RedwoQd City. <br /> We are including a$270.00 check for the appea� filing fee. Thank you �'or <br /> your at;t�n�ion to thi5 impc�rtant matte�. <br /> SinCerely, <br /> Rcibyn C. urehia <br /> RCP:Ijl <br /> Enclosur�s: Check <br /> .A1;tachzne��s A, B ar�d C <br /> 25S6-Ol 2j <br />