Laserfiche WebLink
8. B. - Page 28 <br /> Maureen Riordan <br /> Octobe�~ 26, 20 ] 1 <br /> Page 13 <br /> SAAQM� mod.eling, residential unzts woulcl, therefore, be e�posed ta TAC levels <br /> �hat exceed th� r.ecommended SAA�MD th�es�ol.d. <br /> �ceo�di�g to T)r. Clar�'s modeling, T1�.Cs �evels wo�xld. signi�'icantly exceed <br /> BAAQ�VID tlar�s�olds. Di. C�ark's comrnents iduntify specific flaws in the Ci�p's <br /> mod�Jz�g that distort tlz� Project's t�u� TACs impac�s i,c� residential receptc�rs.� <br /> Model�ng conduc�e€� ��vi�hout these flaws res�l.�s in a risk to resid�ntial receptors on <br /> the Proj�ct sitie of 12.'7 in I,000,000, which exceecl.s 334AQI1�D recommend�d <br /> thresholds.'� <br /> As explained by �r. Clark, the DEI�, lacks subs�antial evidence to support; i.ts <br /> conclusion tha� �he �'roject wi.11 nat result in significant ��u.blic h�al�h impacts. The <br /> City must di�close t�at residential i:�cepto�s on tk�e �roject eite will �e �xposed ta <br /> carcina�e��c poll�ztants �hat exceed recazxsa�z�encled thresholds. The DEIR rnus� <br /> recogn�ze tha.s significant public hea�th impact. T�ze C�ty must r�e�� incorpora�e <br /> specifie mi�i.ga�ion measuz�s in the DEIR so t�ha� impac�s are ��duced. <br /> 2. �`�ae ���R f�iis �� disclose �Y�at r��ad��tia� recep�or� <br /> �ro€�ra� �he �acoject site rraay be e�pQSed to T.AaCs t�.at <br /> e�ceed ���M� thr�s���ds e���°��g P�o�ec� c�n����cta�n <br /> T��E City must disclos� �hat �esidential zeceptors Ioc���� �7ithin 1,000 feet of <br /> �he P�oject sit� may be exposed to carcir�ogenzc: pollutan�s �ha� exce�d BAAQMD <br /> thresha�ds de.zrin� Project construc�io�.�� The City lacks subs�antial evidence Lo <br /> conclude otherwise. T�e C�ty's analysis in �he Cc�mnzunity Rr,sle Assessnzent was <br /> improp�i�y limited to a� ax�alysis of just diesc�l particulal;e zzaatte� ("DPM"}. Tf all <br /> �'oreseeable T.'�Cs a�e considered, resid�nti�l recep�ars a:rc�unt� the Project site may <br /> be e�pt�sed to Jevels exc�eding th� BAA�MD th:reshald. Tn Dr. C�ark's o�ixiic�n, th� <br /> DE�R z�;ust be revised so tl�a� tl�ese potent�ally significant impacts are disclnsed and <br /> zniti�atioz� measur�s p�opos�d. <br /> The City's analysis o� risk fra� consti uction ac�iv��ies only consid�red DPNI. <br /> Hawever, cons�ruc�ion �ctivi�ies a�so emit organic cc�mpounds, or total orgaz�ic <br /> 5 ' Clae�t comnlents, p. 5. <br /> ' lu'. at p. 8. <br /> ss ��y Area �ir Quality Mai�age�nent Dist., Cal. �.nvironmental Quality Act Aiz' Qualit)� Cxuadelines, Ivlay 2€�11, p. 8- <br /> 7. <br /> 2o6G.f�OBj <br />