My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2012-02-13
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
AgdaPkt 2012-02-13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2012 2:23:27 PM
Creation date
2/9/2012 4:35:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
2/13/2012
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
262
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8. B. - Page 32 <br /> Ma��een �,iordan <br /> Oetob�r 26, 201 � <br /> Pag� 17 <br /> cen�ral portzan af F�,edwood Ci��r's peak wet weatl fla�T ("P�TWF") a�Iocation at the <br /> t��ea�me��t plant is 2�.9 mgd.�l �ccording to the City's General Pla� FIR, Redwood <br /> Cit�r h�s exceeded its P���VF allocation over the years duxi�ag signi�icant rain <br /> even�ts.rz <br /> Despit� Redwoc�€� Ci��T's knovvn hzgh PWVVT�', the DEIR c�id not identi�'y the <br /> Praject's PW�VF, did no� anal��ze the Prc�ject's irt�pac�s ta SPSA tzeat�nent plant <br /> capacity anc� did not incar�ao.rate fs�sib�e mitigation �a��asures. Inste�d the DEIR <br /> clismiased an an�lysis o�P��F. �pecifica��y, the DTIR a�ecognized that t;l��r.� are <br /> "wet wea�her conditian capacity" i.ssu�s in Red��oad City and t�en e�ismissed the <br /> iss�.e by saying that "[w]hile l�ec�.�Tood City has w�t weather cor�ditian prab�ems, it <br /> i� considered to be among �he i�dustry's stai�dard." '�`he City's clazm that a <br /> significar�� impact is "staz�dard" is not a legal justification for ignoring th� impac� <br /> und�r CE�A. CEQA directs public agencies to avoid o� �ec�uce envi�onmen�al <br /> darr�age when poasible by Zequi�i�g altarnativ�s flr mi�iga�ios� �nea,su�°e�,� not to <br /> �cv��p significant �.mpae�s trnder �he rug.« <br /> The Czty must identi�y whether the �'roject wi1� exceed the �i�y's wastewater <br /> trea��n�nt capaei�y �uring we� �reather flcsws — an adrni��ed problern. in Redwood <br /> Czty. The DLIR and Appendzx L nate �hat o�e��tion of the pra�osed Yroject would <br /> result in an increas� of 11,5'7 i gpd o� wastewa�er con��axed to the �xiating land <br /> use. �� The I�EIR d.a�s not indica�e whether thzs is �iDWF or P�T�UF. If it is 1�1�W�', <br /> PWWF inay be an �ven higher amo�nt of vvast�water �enerated l�y the prc�posed <br /> Pr[�ject. <br /> Once �h� City has ident��"xet� �he specifae wet w�ather flows f�om the Proj�ct, <br /> the City mus�. �nalyze �he Project'a impac�s. Specz�i.cally, the Citjr must evaluate <br /> wh.ether �he Proj�ct wauld exceer� th� capacity of the SBSA during p�ak we� <br /> weather flaws. This is especially impar�ant because substan�ia� eviclence ��is�s that <br /> t;�e �BS� does z�at have suf�ici�i�� capacity to ��eat �'�rWF. Th� Applicant's <br /> engineering coz�sultan� indicate� that "�he exist�ng main c�oes not cur�entl.y have <br /> 71 City of Redwooci City, Redwood City �e�u Gene�•al 1'lan Draft EIR, May 2010, Utilities, p. 4,1S-i 2. <br /> 72 lbil�. <br /> 7; ����s �- �4. <br /> 74 CEQA Guidelines, § 15002, subd. {a}(2}-(3}; �erk�ley Keep Jets Over dhe Ba�� Com., sarpra, 9I Ca1.App.4th at p. <br /> 13_44. <br /> � ('oncer•ned Citizen,s of Cos�c� .�esa, Inc. v. 32rad Drst. �9griculturcal �s,sn�. (] 98G) Ca�.3d 929, 93�. <br /> 7 � Chuck Htainpal, B�K Eiagineers, mem. to �lainc Breeze, I�;r�a�� �-�ousiat� Ciroup, Feb. 10, 2(311, p. 2; D��IZ, p. 96. <br /> 25(iG.O[SSj <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.