|
8. B. - Page 52
<br /> AADT. i� adjac�nt ta the project is �;I Ca�nino Real �x�itla an
<br /> estii�lated AADT of 48,000. Tkae figure below s3laws that risk for
<br /> r�sidents wEtlzin ap}�roximaiefy �0 ��et of t�e roadway will i�e exposed tn
<br /> risks in excess af � 0 in 1,00�1,000.
<br /> "' � ` � � a� a �� � � � �
<br /> y "$� „
<br /> i ' : � �� q 4 w ' � �,� .-
<br /> ��` �4.'h � � ���. �`" � ��� .4'.'�. '—X.-X � .
<br /> � e
<br /> .. '�... -. .
<br /> !
<br /> E . . � cs-'�": �v
<br /> I . � �" � ? ° '�t "�
<br /> �-� � , �a '��e� _ '`� L— s � tiv. ,;�.
<br /> � � -.,' �� ",�� �� � �a � �:
<br /> � ` _ �.. .,�� -� c e� ,-. .,��� `.,� -�-'� �,,.. ,
<br /> � �ti� �� � � S
<br /> '� ��, `��' � . `.,
<br /> � � � � ` � � �'�,;��" � �
<br /> ���w � � �.�. � �. � ��. . .. ., � � : ,_ a `�.°
<br /> > �
<br /> '�:._ : _ ` ..; cl�
<br /> .-_. ' .Z ' '4" 3 �� � v W .,.�� . ' �°7 � � €Jnk 11& �6ft alevafbn; .. ` "�
<br /> �
<br /> _ � , � - � . � . ��
<br /> r x
<br /> � ��z�r � �� � "'y�. P1d; . i k ',hronHfAr.uleH€ . .
<br /> � �� `�,��,. �.
<br /> ��... � y .+ :�� #PIIS 0','e� i +o3`JO'?4 0025 �S�
<br /> '�.,�' � 25115 01:615-�39U2'. UQ2= -,
<br /> � � h�� ��'.. �� sau5 ur� t7����0�°_ ucfr
<br /> �i:.
<br /> Y 2 � '^ � 75n5 �SA6 1.:1{g00'3 CG31 A � -�
<br /> 0.
<br /> M
<br /> ' �" ;�` � - if�f[5 Oi: �v'�fs PGS7 G6! ✓
<br /> �`
<br /> ^� ^� ,•�
<br /> � "s "� }� ` � � � � elHShS LQ9Q 55. 00'3 [!�9P �� 't'�-:
<br /> - r h �� 31qif15 f.fR L E 11117.. fiR�li :�'^� _
<br /> . � � � �., A�6fl U'� � , k l fIP9A GQ9i `�'��� - :
<br /> :x.
<br /> r,3�.. �r.+' , ,�}',� ^- :� 5UOf€S 0 P �7 0703 OO�C � � ��
<br /> .,� � � - m � '�''�° 7s�res o:.e �� a oaoz uuc< 's7 "� -
<br /> E�_^u� �;�:�w� _ ����$'„�� YWOF[h0' 1L90P.1 GQL3
<br /> ', ��Ts'� - �i�. '. ---"�" � YAIIN u 7 J' �J�o OOcp
<br /> I�.,a� =,� "` ,r _ 3'� �, � 25 n fJ 0�. � Gr 0 0 0 0.3 �
<br /> '�� �� � „�
<br /> � u �; sne� o;a� �i3c �ooi: c�
<br /> ,.� �' q. "' 7�.ftiJ 01.2 17 9 Q� { p(�1M1 � :.�
<br /> ° , `, e `
<br /> ': ��'F s, F ;.,.,. � la}f[ �� oE�a i a rn °. �R,A
<br /> M� � � � `�.
<br /> k � : � �.� � m „ - Tv�ftN O,i°1 _ fEJ12 OQ:3 �'}
<br /> ""� �`. �W1hN UJr"1 ..i. C7Ub 0'�5E
<br /> �L a •e.� - �v�- - � JiM1RN Va'.�x tRP§ G�`?5 Och�E+
<br /> e �,
<br /> -.� ' ` � � .. : : , ., . � _ °,
<br /> h�"_ � � ;,, :
<br /> . . , . _. .ei,. � ;, �.. ,_ . '
<br /> � �: Sli/}([N G}1 .;.;E5 Q>;6 Gatl7
<br /> � '5e�fiNG.30!i�7 �l?]3 0�05
<br /> � � � Z � y. � 7INrOhNC:]:�1 :S,'.n V0�3 :;�10<
<br /> 'n�
<br /> �
<br /> , '�: ��' , ,.�x �'�. ��� '%""
<br /> - Y� n „ � . -; ~q �
<br /> ...- -;_. ,e �.r. . ��'.,. ,,' � � ..
<br /> ,, �
<br /> a
<br /> �
<br /> , V � S -�� '�° _.�. �.`�_ h :
<br /> �
<br /> �� � �:�,� ��u a, � � �
<br /> � ,.
<br /> ' v . � A ,n ��
<br /> , , .... , � , .
<br /> .
<br /> _ � , , � ,
<br /> ,� � _
<br /> ,� ,:�.
<br /> �� 5 : r� � �
<br /> ,: r , �
<br /> .
<br /> � �� �
<br /> ... �-
<br /> �� ,
<br /> '�", x .� .' ,a: . arc � , . . � � . .
<br /> �'igure 2: �A.AQI�!C�� Est�m�te c�f �aneer �isk 1�roaa� Ra�dv►���
<br /> E�issians Alo�g �l C��tia�a IZead, �edwood City, CA.
<br /> I�j addilion, Claxlc calculated �l1at t�e exposure ris�C to new
<br /> receptaa�s is al�rsost 13 in I,ODO,O�Q. This is i�igher than th� ��npanent's
<br /> �lawed calculation of 9.4 in 1,000,000. Flaws in the pro�onent's analysis
<br /> that �ead to t€�e discrepancy include tl.�e use of a cancer risk acEjus�nent
<br /> �acto�• (CRAI') o� L0 a�nisappl�cati�n of the a�e sensitivity fae�tor (AS�j
<br /> as a"�eriodic adjustment factor" that reduce the �otec�tial risk, a�id a
<br /> failure to incorporate age app� ca�lcer weigE�ting fa.ctors.
<br /> zsbc-c�a7� I'ag� 5 of 14 �
<br />
|