AgdaPkt 2012-02-13 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

8. B. - Page 60 opinion, the City's use c��` �SC3 does not prc�vide �� acc�ra�e pict�re of P�•oject's i�npac�s o�� tl�e pote►��tial residcnts of the Pz°oject and the surror.�ndanb community. VI. The D�IR Fa�ls '�o �iscl�se Imapacts t� Sensative �2esidew�tial Receptars 1��aa� tl�e Pro,�ec� �i�e �'11e Project may cau.se significant impaets to sensitive � ��eat� the Project site d�triz��; Project cons�rucfion and Qperation pl�ases. �'1�•st, accordin� tc� BAA.QMD gs.�idatice, t•eside�tial dev�lop��►ents of this pro�nsed project size require a�ninimu��a �offset distance frorr� the project feE�c� Ii�7e to sensitive receptQ� of at l�ast 7 to I00 metei (Table 2 of 201.0 guidance). Tllc nea� set�sit��e rece�to� to il�e prnj�et (adjacersfi reside�atial pyoperty) is less thara 7 meters froin the fer�ce�ine. �'hus, t�3e I?roject does ��ot ca�nply witEa BAAQlO![D guida��ce aaad wil[ have sig�ai�cant impact ott tlae nearby residei3ces during t�e coi�str�ctio�� ancf opea°atio��al phases v,�l�ic� az•e nat adequafiely docur��a�ted in tl�e DEII�. �r� addition, the Ci�y's analysis of pot�ntial healt�Z i�npacts d�.lring the � const�•uctie�n p��ase (A�tach�ne�t 2) shovvs that over ��ae 2'/4 years that eot�structEOn is eapected to occur, the risk fi DI'M ta nearby residents is expected to reach 9 in �.,000,000 f�•o�€ construction activities aic�i�e. The analysis fails to cc��lsider the e�istin� burde�� oi� tl�e residences fi roadway emission w��icl� ar� between 5 in 1,�00,000 and S in I,000,000 for res�dences imn7ediafely adjacent to the project. The cumulati�e i�»pact from construction activities and roadway er�issions for resider7ces ad,jacenfi to the proposed project woulc� therefore exceed the ] 0 in 1,000,000 ihreshald cited in the City's ana[ysis. Ti�se City should revise its analysis I ' BAAQMD. 20I�. Scree��i�g "�'ables Fot• Air Taxics �valuation Dur.in� �ons#ruct€on. May, 2010 � zs�c-oo�t= Page I3 of l4 �