My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2012-02-27
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
AgdaPkt 2012-02-27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2012 4:08:32 PM
Creation date
2/23/2012 4:38:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council
Date
2/27/2012
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
220
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6.6.A. - Page 1 <br />REPORT <br />To the Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From the City Manager <br />February 27, 2012 <br />SUBJECT <br />Proposed new ordinance requiring developers to indemnify the City in the event of third <br />party challenge <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Waive Second Reading and Adopt an Ordinance Adding a New Article IV to Chapter 1 <br />to the Municipal Code Relating to Developer Indemnification. <br />BACKGROUND <br />Redwood City requires that developers mitigate the fiscal impact of processing <br />applications. This policy is embodied in the City Council resolutions requiring <br />reimbursement of costs associated with development. Another cost is litigation. <br />ANALYSIS <br />Typically, the City requires as condition of project approval that the developer will <br />defend and indemnify the City in the event a third party challenge of the project or the <br />environmental determination. An indemnification provision has also been recently added <br />to planning permit application forms. This puts developers on notice early on in the <br />process. However, this requirement has not been codified. Staff recommends that this <br />requirement be adopted as an ordinance and included in the City Code to provide <br />additional notice to developers of the City's requirements. The City Council waived the <br />first reading and introduced the ordinance on February 6, 2012, and it is presented at <br />this meeting for second reading and adoption. <br />FISCAL IMPACT <br />In the event of litigation against the City, the developer would be required to pay the <br />cost for attorney fees and costs for the City to defend such lawsuits. Without such <br />indemnification, the City can either not defend its decision or might incur substantial <br />costs for which the developer should be responsible. <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />1. Make changes to the proposed ordinance. <br />2. Do not introduce the proposed ordinance. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW <br />Not applicable. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.