My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2003-10-27
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2003
>
AgdaPkt 2003-10-27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2011 2:07:56 PM
Creation date
10/23/2003 3:03:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
10/27/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
fill: <br />Commission chose Option #3 so that the citizens would have some input and that <br />his recollection is that the same was adopted by the City Council . <br />Ralph Nobles stated he came to advocate to the Council for the d use <br />permit or Option #3. He stated that the Council still makes the final decision and it <br />provides democracy. <br />Sally Cadigan from the Child Care Coordinating Council stated she was <br />highlighting a letter from the San Mateo County Child Care Partnership Council <br />(Attachment #6) dated June 3, 2003. She explained that family child care is a key <br />part of the child care supply in the community and that large family child care is <br />more financially viable than smaller centers. The large center operators are more <br />like to have attained college credits and therefore, specialized training in child <br />development and more likely to utilize resources to care for low income children <br />such as subsidies. She urged Council to choose the next best alternative, the non - <br />discretionary permit. <br />David H. Wolfskill recalled his involvement in a dispute with a family daycare <br />home operator regarding the operator's use of Mr. Wolfskill's front yard in <br />furtherance of operation of the family day care from January 1996 through <br />December 1997. He stated that the condition was alleviated after spending two <br />years and over $85,000.00. He strongly encouraged Council to select the sole <br />—� option provided by the State that provides the slightest notification of a subset of <br />potentially affected neighbors, Option #3. He stated that he would support a less <br />onerous option if it preserved the right of potentially affected neighbors' <br />notification. <br />Veronica Glaser, a large day care family provider in Redwood City, stated she was <br />present to support the child care providers. She described her history as a child <br />care provider for three years and that she has a nice working relationship with her <br />neighbors, the neighbors enjoy the children, there are elderly people who live <br />nearby and there is a retirement home from which residents walk by and enjoy the <br />children. She stated that there is harmony in the neighborhood and that traffic is <br />not an issue in that drop off occurs at various times in the morning and pick -up <br />begins at 4:00. She encouraged working together and communicating. <br />Lillian Clark stated that she was a parent affected by the lack of child care 8 years <br />ago and had two weeks to place 70 children in the city and there were no slots <br />available. She stated that parents with school age children can be accommodated <br />at large day care centers and that it should be less restricted. <br />Nita Spangler stated that the problem is the cul-de -sac is poorly designed with a <br />tight fit that enters out to Alameda de las Pulgas making it difficult to get in and out <br />of when school lets out. She stated that it is not a very good place for people to <br />REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES <br />MINUTES Book No. 60 <br />Page No. 44 <br />AUGUST 25, 2003 <br />PAGE 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.