Laserfiche WebLink
6.1.A. -Page 24 y of Redwood City <br />[vapor tcci & har=n <br />Peet Review Report <br />Page Two, <br />Proposal <br />quality control policies and procedures to the QxLent we considered <br />appropriate, These te:;t& covered the application of the finer': policies and <br />procedures on selected engztyements. Our review was based on selective testy <br />therefore it would not necessarily detect all wnakness,:s in the syotem of <br />duality control or all instances of noncompliance with it. Ther, are <br />.inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any syotem of quality control <br />and therefore noncompliance with the system of quality control may occur and <br />not be detected. Projec[ ion of any evalua&0is of z system of quality <br />control to future por.iods is subject to the risk that the system of quality <br />c•oncrol may becorrte inadequate because of changnr, in conditions, or because <br />the degree Of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorOte. <br />In our opinion, the system of quality control for the accWnKng and <br />auclitiny practice of Coporicci A Larson, CertiEied Public Accountants in <br />effect for the year endc:'d December 31, 2007, ha,; hx ^e:n tic•signed to meet tile <br />req uiremencK of the duality control standards fair an accounting and auditing <br />pzar_•tico entablishod by the ATCPA and was coiRpliod with during the year then <br />undo -d to provirlrf the fictrc with reasonable asuurance of cunfcarminq with <br />ptufus'sional standards, <br />�- ` L 31 e rtes t t- L! <br />Rancho Cucamonga, California <br />May 9, 2008 <br />0 F1 1 E iJ LLP <br />Caporieci & Larson, CPAs 1 6 <br />y'r <br />Y <br />k� <br />Eli <br />s <br />4 f <br />x 3 <br />