Laserfiche WebLink
94 2 <br />I i& Financing <br />Under the California constitution, cities may not incur debt without voter approval. This <br />constitutional limitation does not apply to special purpose financing authorities, such as <br />the PFA. Pursuant to a Site Lease, the PFA will use the proceeds of the bond sale to <br />make a one - time -only site lease payment to the City in which the PFA will become the <br />lessee of certain r3al property owned by the City. The PFA will then lease these <br />properties back to Me City for an annual lease payment that equals the principal and <br />interest payments the PFA is obligated to make to the bond holders. This is the same <br />arrangement the City used when issuing the 1986 and 1991 bonds, the proceeds of <br />which were used to construct the main library, main fire station, and the police facility. <br />Refinancing of 1991 Bonds <br />In 1986 the City sold $14.1 million lease revenue bonds to fund construction of the <br />library and the main fire station. The bonds were amortized over a 25 year period <br />through FY 2011/12. In 1991 the City refinanced the 1986 bonds and issued additional <br />lease revenue bonds to fund construction of the City's main police facility. In 1998 a <br />portion of the 1991 bonds was refinanced to take advantage of lower interest rates and <br />hence reduce debt service costs. Under federal tax law, the balance of the 1991 bonds <br />could not be refinanced until 2003. As a rule -of- thumb, net percent value (NPV) savings <br />from a refinancing should equal at least three percent of the par amount of refinancing <br />bonds sold. At present interest rates, staff expects the City to achieve approximately six <br />percent savings. <br />New Money Loan to Agency <br />The City Council and Agency Board approved a tax allocation bond sale of up to $34 <br />million to finance Agency redevelopment projects. Debt service on Agency tax <br />allocation bonds was set at the maximum that staff and its financing consultants <br />determined the Agency could pay and still obtain a credit rating of "A -" which rating <br />designation was deemed critical to the success of the financing. That plan included a <br />loan from the City to be funded with PFA lease revenue bonds. Staff originally <br />anticipated a need of up to $4.5 million for this loan. After the sale of the <br />Redevelopment Agency bonds, it is now only necessary to loan the City $2.89 million. <br />Payments by the Agency on the loan from the City will be subordinate to the Agency's <br />tax allocation bond payments, a critical security feature that allowed the Agency to <br />achieve its rating and successfully market its bonds as planned. A sources and uses of <br />funds schedule for the proposed bond sale is attached for your review (Attachment II). <br />The City loan to the Agency will be structured to give the City and Agency maximum <br />flexibility regarding the use of tax increment dollars. On a year -by -year basis the City <br />will be able to allow the Agency to defer all or a portion of the scheduled loan payments. <br />"Scheduled" loan payments will be approximately $150,000 annually through FY <br />2010/11, and $500,000 thereafter through FY 2018/19. The City Council will make this <br />determination as it deems appropriate. <br />The Agency's ability to undertake redevelopment activities expires in 2028, ten years <br />before its ability to collect tax increment to repay. loans expires in 2037. At the modest <br />assessed valuation growth of two percent annually, the Agency is expected to be able <br />to repay the City in full from tax increment revenues even if all debt repayments to the <br />City are deferred until 2029. <br />2 <br />