AgdaPkt 2012-04-23 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

� . - . . OUPLICATE � EXHIBITA � 6.1. F. - Page 8 ` ORIGlNAi. � FIRST ADDENDUM TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF. SAN MA.TEO AND THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY TO TOLL STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS FOR CLAIMS REGARDING PROPERTY TAX ADMINISTRATION FEES " WHEREAS, the City of Redwood City (the "City") and the County of San Mateo (the • "County") (collectively the "Parties") may become involved in litigation regarding the County's calculation of the property taac administration fee (the "PTAF"j as related to the Triple Flip (Rev. & Tax Code § 97.68) and the Vehicle License Fee swap (Rev. & Tax Code § 97.70) that the County charges the City, pwrsuant to the Revenue and Taxation Code, beginning in the fiscal year 2004-2005; WIIEREAS, the City filed a claim with the County seeking a refund of the amount of PTAF that the City claims the County overcharged the City in the 2006-2007 and 2007-2008 � f scal years; WHEREAS the County denied the claim and the Parties entered into a tolling agr�ement, on February 1$, 2009, a copy of which is attaehed hereto as Exhibit "A" (the "Tolling Agreement"); WHEREAS, the City has now submitted a claim with tl�e County seeking a refund of the amount of PTAF that the City claims the County overeharged the City in the 2008-2009 fiscal year (the "2008-2009 Claim"); WHEItEAS, the Parties now wish to bring th� 2008-2009 claim within.the scope of the Tolling Agreement; NOW, TF�EREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE-AS FOLLOWS: 1. �The Parties agree to toll the applicable statutes of limitations for either party to file a claim, complaint, or petition against the other withxespect to the calculation of the PTAF for the 2008-2009 fiscal year including, but not limited to, the applicable statutes of limitations for the City to file a complaint or pedtion seeking a refund or reailocation to the City of the PTAF that the City contends the County overcharged th� City for the 2008-2009 fiscal yeaz, w�ich the City contends resulted in an under-allocation of property taxes to the City for the 2U08-2009 fiscal year. , 2. The City and the County agree not to file any claims and not to initiate or participate in litigation against each other related to the PTAF for the 2008-2009 fiscal year while this agreement is in effect. , 3. This agreement constitutes the entire understanding of the Parties with respect to the tolling of the Ciry's and the County's claims as set forth in Section 1 above, arid eorrectly states the rights, duties, and obligations of each Party as of the ef�ective date of this agreement. Any prior understandings, promises, negotiations, or representations between the parties not expressiy stated in this document are not binding. 4. Subsequent modifications of this agreement, including but not limited to the extension or amendment of the agreement, shall not be valid or effective unless set forth in 1