Laserfiche WebLink
EXHIBIT A <br /> 6.1. F. - Page 10 <br /> SECOND ADDENDUM TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN <br /> THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO AND THE GITY OF REDWOOD CITY <br /> TO TOLL STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS FOR CLAIMS <br /> REGARDING PROPERTY TAX ADMINISTRATION FEES <br /> WHEREAS, the City of Redwood City (the "City") and the County of San Mateo (the <br /> "County") (collectively the "Parties") may become involved in litigation regarding the County's <br /> calculation of the property tax administration fee (the "PTAF") as related to the Triple Flip (Rev. <br /> & Tax Code § 97.68) and the Vehicle License Fee swap (Rev. & Tax Code § 97.70) that the <br /> County charges the City, pursuant to the Revenue and Taxation Code, beginning in the fiscal <br /> year2004-OS; <br /> WHEREAS, the City filed a claim with the County seeking a refund of the amount of <br /> PTAF that the City claims the County overcharged the City in the 2006-07 and 2007-08 fiscal <br /> years {the "2006-08 Claim"); <br /> WHEREAS, the Parties entered into a tolling agreement on February 18, 2009, a copy of <br /> which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" (the "Tolling Agreement"); <br /> WHEREAS, the County denied the 2006-08 Claim on March 31, 2009; <br /> WHEREAS, the City filed a claim with the County seeking a refund of the amount of <br /> PTAF that the City claims the County overcharged the City in the 2008-09 fiscal year (the <br /> "2008-09 Claim"); <br /> WHEREAS, the County denied the 2008-09 Claim on December 1 S, 2009; <br /> WHEREAS, the County and the City agreed to an addendum to the Tolling Agreement, <br /> to bring the 2008-09 Claim within its scope, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" <br /> (the "First Addendum"); <br /> WHEREAS, the City has now filed a Claim with the County seeking a refund of the <br /> amount of PTAF that the City claims the County overcharged the City in the 2009-10 fiscal year <br /> (the "2009-10 Claim"); , <br /> WHEREAS, the City and County axe aware that other cities and counties in other areas <br /> of the State are involved, or may become involved, in litigation concerning the calculation of the <br /> PTAF; <br /> WIiEREAS, the Parties desire to avoid litigation in order to allow for additional time to <br /> evaluate the law as it develops on this state-wide issue; <br /> WHEREAS, the Parties now wish to bring the 2009-2010 Claim within the scope of the <br /> Tolling Agreement; <br /> 1 <br />