My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2012-04-23
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
AgdaPkt 2012-04-23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2012 3:14:08 PM
Creation date
4/19/2012 5:48:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
4/23/2012
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
222
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6.1.G. - Page 2 <br /> The easement agreement requires the city to accept liability for the proposed <br /> improvements and to indemnify PG&E from claims arising within the easement area, <br /> including actions by the city and the public. The agreement also requires the city to <br /> maintain insurance coverage that names PG&E as an additionally insured. <br /> Maintenance <br /> The proposed easement agreement relieves PG&E from any responsibility to maintain <br /> the trail. Although PG&E owns the property and the earth berm which will form the <br /> foundation of the trail, the agreement stipulates that PG&E has no obligation to maintain <br /> this foundation should significant erosion or breach occur. If PG&E decides not to <br /> repair the earth berm, should it fail, the city, although not responsible for such repairs to <br /> the earth berm, may opt to make the necessary repairs in order to continue providing a <br /> public trail. Staff believes that the risk of failure is low and that the risk is far outweighed <br /> by the benefit to the public of providing a trail through the proposed easement. If <br /> neither party makes repairs to the earth berm or trail, PG&E would be entitled to close <br /> the trail to the public. <br /> Next Steps <br /> Other approvals are needed in addition to the grant of easement from PG&E for this <br /> project to move forward. Staff must obtain a permit from the San Francisco Bay <br /> Conservation and Development Commission due to the project site's proximity to the <br /> Bay. As a regulated agency PG&E must obtain approval from the California Public <br /> Utilities Commission (CPUC) prior to authorizing work on its land. <br /> ALTERNATIVES <br /> Council may choose to direct staff to renegotiate the terms of the easement agreement. <br /> Council may also choose not to accept the trail public access easement and direct staff <br /> to discontinue securing property rights on PG&E land for the proposed project. Both <br /> alternatives would mean the loss of federal grant funds for the project if property rights <br /> are not secured by April 30, 2012. <br /> FISCAL IMPACT <br /> Staff has proposed payment of $1,000.00 to PG&E in return for the trail public access <br /> easement based on an appraisal of the easement. By executing the easement <br /> agreement and accepting the trail public access easement the city incurs additional <br /> liability for activities associated with the use of this land as a public trail resulting in a <br /> potential fiscal impact that is difficult to quantify. <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW <br /> As the lead agency, the City of Redwood City has determined that the construction of <br /> the Bair Island Bay Trail Improvement Project meets the categorical exemption criteria <br /> pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines 14 CCR 15301 (c) <br /> Existing Facilities. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.