Laserfiche WebLink
7.A. - Page 2 <br /> Downtown Revitalization Potential <br /> Depending on occupancy, the project would place about 574 employees on the site, <br /> assuming 2.2 employees per 1,000 square feet (this was the basis for General Plan <br /> projections). The actual number depends on the type of tenant. For example, high tech <br /> firms may place a higher number of employees in interactive open floor plans, while <br /> executive office suites may place fewer employees in larger private offices. <br /> The employees could provide a strong presence on streets in the area, boosting the <br /> liveliness of the sidewalks and providing economic stimulus associated with coffee <br /> breaks, lunch breaks, happy hour, and miscellaneous shopping. However, it is not clear <br /> from the proposal to what degree this activity would materialize. If the office tenants <br /> equip their spaces with significant cafeterias, lounges, and recreational facilities, then <br /> the presence of the workers outside of the building could be minimal. <br /> It is more challenging to estimate how much activity would result from the hotel use, <br /> because it is unclear what the average occupancy rate would be, and how many people <br /> would be present per guest room. However, it is not unreasonable to assume that 50 to <br /> 100 people per day would be present in the area because of the hotel. Given the easy <br /> access to restaurants and entertainment, and the constrained hotel site, these visitors <br /> are likely to frequent Downtown establishments. <br /> The office buildings and the hotel would add diversity to Downtown's land use portfolio. <br /> The development proposes large floor-plate Class A office space, which is not widely <br /> available in the Downtown. Consequently, it should be attractive to new types of <br /> tenants for the area. The hotel is a new type of use for powntown and would add a <br /> service that is currently lacking. <br /> Office tenants have not been identified by Hunter/Storm for the project. Although the <br /> Downtown Redwood City office market is presently strong, and the developer has <br /> expressed confidence that the buildings would be occupied quickly, it is impossible to <br /> ensure that the building will be occupied within a defined period of time after the <br /> completion of construction, especially without commitments from tenants. <br /> Desiqn <br /> The design appears to conform to the Downtown Precise Plan (Plan). It is important to <br /> make this distinction at this time, as there are no architectural plans for the project, only <br /> renderings of concepts. The details of design will be resolved during the negotiation <br /> process and presented to the Council as a part of a Development Agreement. <br /> The architecture is considered streamlined Neoclassical and does not conflict <br /> aesthetically with the surrounding building stock. The main "Redwood Tower" building <br /> is visually divided into a base, middle, and cap, which helps to create a sense of <br /> pedestrian scale in a large structure. The "Flatiron Building" does not follow these <br /> guidelines as closely. The facades follow the shape of the streets, creating an urban <br /> presence. The height limit appears to be met. There is a potential issue with the <br />