My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2012-05-21
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
AgdaPkt 2012-05-21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2012 3:33:37 PM
Creation date
5/17/2012 3:22:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Special
Agency Type
City Council
Date
5/21/2012
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
319
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8.A. - Page 6 <br /> Clearly state that other than Building ID This won't actually change the regulations, but will make them <br /> signs, no signage is allowed on the 2nd much easier to understand for staff and applicants. Presently, <br /> floor or above. this rule is hard to find as it is only located in the Signage <br /> Regulations Chart legend. <br /> Move general Private Frontage Type Due to being embedded in the intro text, these rules are difficult <br /> rules from the intro of Section 2.8.4 to to identify. <br /> their own section called "2.8.3-F General <br /> Private Frontage Regulations". <br /> Allow "Common Entry" frontage to be The original DTPP inadvertently limited this to upper floor uses, <br /> used for upper floor and/or ground floor but it is also an appropriate way to access ground floor uses. <br /> uses. <br /> The specific text and chart edits, which carry out these changes, are provided in the <br /> proposed resolution (Attachment 1). <br /> Parking <br /> Although the proposed amendments do not result in revisions to the parking standard <br /> provided in the DTPP, the Planning Commission also recommended that the City <br /> Council consider the institution of incentives that would shift office related parking <br /> demands away from Broadway and other congested areas to the Marshall Garage and <br /> other areas with excess capacity. This recommendation will be considered and <br /> evaluated as a part of the overall and ongoing analysis of Downtown parking. Within <br /> the broader context of public parking there are issues to be evaluated, such as rates, <br /> additional locations for public parking facilities, and existing contractual commitments <br /> tied to development projects. Staff anticipates returning to the City Council with <br /> recommendations for the parking program in the fall. <br /> Code Enforcement <br /> Through conversation with both the Downtown Business Group and the Planning <br /> Commission the issue of storefronts that do not comply with the Downtown Precise Plan <br /> regulations was raised. Specifically, there are new office uses that have installed <br /> darkening film to their windows and heavy curtains, as well. The impact of these design <br /> treatments is to cut off the interior uses from the street, which is contrary to the <br /> regulations of the Plan. Additionally, there are numerous retailers who have also <br /> treated their windows to block the interaction of the interior space and the pedestrian <br /> zone outside. The City's Code Enforcement staff, working with the Economic <br /> Development Coordinator, has completed an evaluation of code compliance issues in <br /> the core downtown. The next planned step is to reach out to the building owners and <br /> tenants to gain voluntary compliance. Staff has spoken directly to some of the <br /> businesses that were identified in public testimony as being apparently non-compliant. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.