Laserfiche WebLink
8.A. - Page 237 <br /> motives,yet it appears that they still chose not to develop any independent <br /> alternatives, despite repeated requests from us and others to do so.The EIR is left <br /> with only one alternative independently derived,which is from our group,and <br /> which has been determined to be more impactful than the project despite the lack af <br /> any substantial evidence to support that conclusion. <br /> As noted by Grassetti Environmental and us in previous camments,the alternative <br /> analysis is a majar deficiency in this EIR,and it clearly appears to�e a result of the <br /> City relinquzshing it5 responsihilities under CEQA to#he developer. <br /> It is therefore difficu�t,under these circumstances,ta expect the public to be <br /> confiaent of the verac2ty of any af the conclusions drawn in this E1R.This product <br /> was clearly not the intent of the Settlement Agreement. <br /> Respectfuliy submitted, <br /> Finger Avenue Pride Committee <br />