Laserfiche WebLink
8.A. - Page 364 <br /> REDEv-nrrszen iv�ees <br /> From: Linda Vetter <sil�ercharm@pacbell.net> <br /> Sent: Sunday,June 17, 2012 8;24 PM <br /> To: GRP-Planning Commissioners <br /> Subject: Finger A�enue Project <br /> Planning Cammissianers, <br /> We see that the Finger Avenue Project is bacic again. From what we can tell no substantial changes have been <br /> made since it was last up for consideration. Things like the creek setback, roadway design with increased traffic <br /> and parking issues, massiveness of the project and its compatibility with the suxrottnding neighborhoad laak to <br /> be continuing problems. <br /> In a demacracy progress often means compramise with none of the various interest groups getting everything <br /> I exact�y the way they want it. It appears to us that the developer in this case refuses to do anything maJor to <br /> scale back the scope of this project. A cynic would assume the developer has penciled in the exact aevelopment <br /> they want to maacimize their profit and will not compromise. If they get their wish, they will take their money <br /> and be gone and the cammunity, including the owners of these homes, will be left ta deal with the conseguences <br /> for the long term. That isn't right. <br /> We urge you to reject this current praposa� for the Finger Avenue Project. <br /> Thanks, <br /> Terry BlanchardlLinda Vetter <br /> 2�G Finger Avenue <br /> Reawaod City, CA 94052 <br /> i <br />