My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2003-12-08
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2003
>
AgdaPkt 2003-12-08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2011 1:54:02 PM
Creation date
12/4/2003 3:54:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
12/8/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
- 1 <br />the adjoining terrain and relatively moderate slope. Also the impacts of roadway and <br />housing construction on these lots would not be as significant as building on the other <br />vacant lots. Most of the lots further west of the site are steeper and have more <br />vegetation. These two vacant parcels also have water and sewer utilities along their <br />street frontage, whereas the parcels west of the site do not. <br />Therefore, three factual circumstances differentiate these oarcels from the other <br />va:.ant parcels west of the site, and could serve as a basis for allowing development <br />without preparation of an EIR and related technical studies. Thrt a circumstances are: <br />• The roadway in front of 3718 Laurel Way (APN 057 - 301 -220) and the adjoining <br />parcel (APN- 053- 301 -230) can be built without adding retaining walls and <br />requiring major grading as identified on improvement plans entitled, "Laurel Way <br />Improvement Unit No. 2," dated 9/13/71 on file with Engineering and <br />Construction. <br />• These properties have water and sewer utilities along their street frontage. <br />• The impacts of roadway construction, grading, and home construction would be <br />less than those impacts on the remaining vacant and steeper parcels. <br />2. Recommended Improvements <br />Based on these facts, the above two owners of the vacant properties would be able <br />to build on their respective properties and will not have to participate in any future <br />assessment districts or have to contribute toward the preparation of an EIR, <br />technical studies, or other reports. As a condition of development, they would have <br />to build roadway improvements along their entire frontage and extend the <br />improvement across for 22 ft. of the total 29 ft. wide street , thereby improving <br />access. For these reasons those property owners do not have to contribute to all the <br />- technical studies and the EIR for the remaining parcels on Laurel Way. <br />3. Consistency with Previous Actions <br />If Council agrees with these findings and conclusion, then it should also modify the <br />condition of approval for the developed property at 3726 Laurel Way (Wayne Aozasa <br />Property) so the conditions of that parcel and the appellant's property at 3718 Laurel <br />Way are consistent. It should change the condition of approval at 3726 Laurel Way so <br />that the owner of that property only needs to pay for the roadway improvement and not <br />contribute toward a future assessment district or Environmental Impact Report (similar <br />to what is being recommended for the appellant's property). If approved, staff will <br />contact the owner of 3726 Laurel Way and notify him of these changes. <br />4. Policy for Remainder of Laurel Way <br />However, all other vacant parcels along Laurel Way that are located westerly of <br />3726 Laurel Way would have to comply with the requirement that an EIR and <br />technical studies (geological, engineering, etc.) covering the entire undeveloped <br />area be prepared prior to any development in accordance with Council's policy <br />adopted in 1998. Those requirements, as stated in the 1988 staff report, include: <br />Preparation of an environmental impact report for the entire area <br />The reason for requiring a 22 -ft. wide roadway instead of the total of 29 ft. is because the <br />property owner of the existing house across the street at 3729 Laurel Way does not have any <br />obligation to widen his /her frontage. Also to be fair to the subject applicants, they should not have <br />to pay for frontage improvements that benefit the property across the street. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.