Laserfiche WebLink
6.5.C. - Page 2 <br /> Under DIVCA, new entrants into a market that are not operating under a franchise <br /> issued by a local government are permitted to obtain a state franchise at any time. <br /> Incumbent cable operators, such as Comcast and Astound, were required to continue to <br /> operate under their local franchises until either their local franchise expired or a new <br /> provider, such as AT&T or Verizon, begins offering services under a state franchise, at <br /> which point an incumbent may elect to terminate its local franchise and obtain a state <br /> franchise. <br /> In this jurisdiction, Comcast has elected to continue to operate under its local franchise <br /> until it expires in 2021. AT&T obtained a state franchise from the CPUC to serve the City <br /> effective March 30, 2007, and thereafter began offering video services in the City under <br /> this state franchise. Astound also began operating under a state franchise on November <br /> 9, 2009, after its local franchise expired. Until its local franchise expires or it chooses to <br /> seek a state franchise covering the City, Comcast will continue to operate under Article <br /> III of Chapter 11 of the Municipal Code and its local franchise, while AT&T and Astound <br /> are governed by DIVCA and their state franchises issued by the CPUC. The proposed <br /> ordinance would set forth the requirements for the companies operating under a state- <br /> issued franchise. <br /> While DIVCA shifts much of the regulatory authority over video providers to the CPUC, it <br /> does preserve some local government regulatory authority. For example, DIVCA allows <br /> local authorities: (i) to continue to collect franchise fees subject to a 5% cap; (ii) to <br /> continue to collect PEG fees subject to certain limitations; (iii) to enforce customer <br /> service standards imposed under state and federal law; and (iv) to continue to impose <br /> right-of-way management and permitting requirements, subject to certain restrictions <br /> imposed by DIVCA. <br /> The purpose of the proposed ordinance presented to the Council is to allow the City to <br /> implement and enforce its local authority preserved under DIVCA, as follows: <br /> 1) DI VCA allows local governments to assess a franchise fee on holders of state <br /> franchises in an amount not to exceed what is being charged to incumbent providers <br /> and in any case not to exceed 5% of gross revenues. <br /> The proposed ordinance is designed to implement the regulatory authority that <br /> has been preserved to the City under DIVCA. The ordinance imposes a 5% <br /> franchise fee, the same as was imposed on incumbent cable companies under <br /> local franchises, and the maximum permitted under DIVCA. So whether <br /> operating under a local franchise issued by the City or a state franchise issued by <br /> the CPUC, the operators will pay the same franchise fee. The ordinance also <br /> imposes the maximum late charge allowed under DIVCA. <br /> 2) DIVCA allows local governments to establish a fee by ordinance to support public, <br /> educational and government (PEG) channel facilities, subject to certain limitations. <br /> The PEG fee may be between 1% and 3% of gross revenues, depending on the fee <br /> a local government was charging an incumbent cable provider as of December 31, <br /> 2006. If a PEG fee under a franchise agreement was /ess than 1%, the City can <br />