My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2012-09-10
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
AgdaPkt 2012-09-10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2012 5:16:54 PM
Creation date
9/6/2012 4:57:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency
Date
9/10/2012
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
900
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6.5.D. - Page 3 <br /> In the case of Block 2 (because the bonds have been paid off), such amendment would <br /> allow the City to use the sales proceeds from the proposed Bock 2 sale for purchase or <br /> improvement of other off-street parking, to pay off parking loans, or for any other <br /> municipal purpose. <br /> In addition to the substantive amendments provided above, the Ordinance's language <br /> relating to the Ordinance's superiority over the Parking District Law of 1951 could use <br /> some clarification to make clear when the City Ordinance or the Parking District Law of <br /> 1951 controls. It was the intent of Ordinance 785 when adopted that it supersede and <br /> control over the provisions of the Parking District Law of 1951. The amendment <br /> proposed would make clear the Ordinance supersedes the Parking District Law of 1951 <br /> both where the provisions of the Parking District Law of 1951 are inconsistent and also <br /> where the subject matter is inconsistent with the City's Ordinance. <br /> As such, it is recommended that Ordinance No. 785 be amended as provided in <br /> Attachment 1 to this staff report, to (a) provide the City with more flexibility to use the <br /> proceeds of City's sale of property, and (b) clarify the meaning of the Ordinance to <br /> specifically state that the Ordinance supersedes and controls over the Parking District <br /> Law of 1951. <br /> ALTERNATIVES <br /> 1. Do not adopt the proposed ordinance amendment and retain the requirements <br /> and language of Ordinance No. 785 as originally adopted. <br /> 2. Adopt the proposed ordinance amendment, with revisions as directed by the City <br /> Council. <br /> FISCAL IMPACT <br /> The proposed ordinance amendment will provide the City with more flexibility on the use <br /> of property sale proceed and thus may result in additional funds to the City. <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW <br /> The proposed ordinance is not a "project" subject to the California Environmental Act as <br /> it is a governmental activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in <br /> the environment. <br /> pa�� <br /> PAMELA THOMPSON <br /> CITY ATTORNEY <br /> �" <br /> ROBERT B. BELL <br /> CITY MANAGER <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.