Laserfiche WebLink
8.A. - Page 325 <br /> moti�es,yet it apgears thak they still chose not ta develop any independent <br /> alternatives,despite repeated req�zests from us a�d others to do so,The EIR is left <br /> w�ith anly one alternative inc�e�endentty derived,which is from our group,and <br /> which has beer�determinea to be more impactful than the project despite the lack af <br /> any substantial evidence Yo support that conclusion. <br /> As noted by Grassetti �nvironmental and us in pr�vious comments,the alternative <br /> analysis is a major deficiency in this EiR,and it clearly appears to be a result of the <br /> City relfnquis�ing its r�sponsi6ilities under CE�A to the r�eve�aper. <br /> It is therefore difficc�It,under these circurnstances,to expect t�e gublic ta�e <br /> canfident of the veracity of any af the conclusions drawn in this EIR.This praduct <br /> Enras clearly nat the intent of the Setttement Agreemer�t. <br /> Respectfully subznitked, <br /> �inger Avenue Aride Corr:mittee <br />