My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2012-09-10
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
AgdaPkt 2012-09-10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2012 5:16:54 PM
Creation date
9/6/2012 4:57:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency
Date
9/10/2012
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
900
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8.A. - Page 334 <br /> lack of p��Strian access, he added paye�s in�he raadway and convertea ttre road to a one�way design. In <br /> ()ctober,2009, tl�e City Coeir�cil oon�vi.uced him to raise the pavers up 3"to make it look mare like a sidewalk. <br /> lfiat's the extent of changes to the roadway design. <br /> ReIate� to this issue is the creek. Those of yau who were on#]xe Comrnission in 2009 will remember, and the <br /> rest of you may be awaze, that the deveioper and th�City wagec�war fpr nearly 4 years over where the top o#' <br /> the creek banlc {TQB)was located. �n his ori�inal proposal, the Ves�img Tenta.tive Map sho�red the TOB <br /> coincidezrt with the location af the top of a 1-2' high retaining wall that occurs Zaeal�y atnng the edge of tlae <br /> stream chaz�nel bottom—a fu�18' ar more be�aw#he su�raunding land. Witl�the baz�c top at this locatian, Mz, <br /> McGowan was able to argcie t�,at he was ix1 cnrnpliance with the Creek 5etbaak Ordinance. It�sa gave hi� <br /> �nore net lot area(re, building site area). It took two years before Mr. McCrowan agrced to mo�ve the top of bank <br /> up the ahannel wall. This occwred w�en the City agreed he could qualafy for a Use Permit to exempt him froz� <br /> t�e setbac�c. <br /> Tbe2-e stitl was a problem,however. At the nort�tern�nd af the site,the stream channe!mazgin ehang�s from a <br /> very steeply sloped wa11 tQ one that is a bit gent�er. We've argved that this chaxage is the result af a soi�slump <br /> that occurred ox�the bank sc�me tirne aga. Others have argued a di:F�'erent origin,but no matter. Th�slope <br /> characteristic noticeably chauges in th�s area. Then City Engin�e�-Jon Lynch, w�Q was the ultinzate arbiter at <br /> the tims on this rnatter, c�e�termined that the top of b�nk adjacen.t ta�ots 3 and 4 should be placec� at similar <br /> eleva�ion to the more alearly defined#op of bank faxther saut[�, and keep the Iine at 1' above the 100-year flood <br /> sur�aee, wlaach is shawn on�he F�MA maps to be contair�ed vv�thin the ehannel itsel£ One could azgue other <br /> ways to define the Iine, but Mr. Lynch's determi�aation was object�ve a.nd jusfifiab�e, He had a co�€sultant <br /> confir��Zis deterrnination as a reasonable one. <br /> Mr.MoGnwan aaad his engineer,Dan McCleod,however,prvposed the top of banlc should occur fart]�er dau�a <br /> t}ze slope adjacent to lots 3 and 4—on th,e arder of I 0' or more, in map view,cIaser to the center of t�e creek. <br /> There were no speci�c criteria identified for why t�e lin�e shouId be where it was pIaced,but M�r, McGowan <br /> hired his vwn�onsultant to �f�irm that HIS linis was a reasonable piace to loeate the tpp af bank. Tlais battle <br /> la.sted for nearly another 2 years unti� Jan Lynch retized in the Fall of 20�8. In Uecembex,20U8, then <br /> Carnmunity Deve�opment Dixector Chu Chang issued a letter acceptirxg tizo applicant's top-of-banlr�oca�.on <br /> "for use in determining the 25-foot setback re�uiremenC nnder Redwood City Zaning Ordinance Section 32,12." <br /> Mr. McGowan wins this battle. <br /> Hawever,Mr. Chang said something else: <br /> "For other purpases, such as desigrr vf a fload cnntrol channel, or evaduatarrg the stability of the bank redative <br /> to siting a bu8lding, a more car�servative interpretation is apprapriate. For such purposes, I accept the City <br /> Engirreer's TOB locatian. " <br /> In other words,the applicant's TQB applies ONLY to determining the requir�d setback line far the stormwatear <br /> ordinance. O�r question is, is this an appropriate line for establishing t�e baundary o�ih�creek channel foar <br /> aetermination vf building sire area7 <br /> At�aohead are twa f�gures c�eriv�d from the 3D model we k�ad constructed of�,e site. These sl�ow perspective <br /> vaiews of the bat�c. Solid lines are the i-ft contour lines from the cuzrent Vestiang Te�.tativ�Map. Maaels of the <br /> creekside homes,and people are addea fpr scaIe. The red I�ne ctas�ly approxirnates txie appIicant's T4B <br /> location. The blue line is Jon Lyzach's TpB (as best as can be transcribed fram nates in the record). <br /> You can ses pretty cleaxly tI1at at the departure poin#, tlie applicant°s TOB c�ps in elevatian nearly 3 ft to sicirt <br /> around the"slump'°�d then rises again ar�d �.grees more clasely with Mr. Lynch's line at the property <br /> bounda�y. As we've shown b�fore,this�ine Ires within the char�,e1 belaw the 1�0-year flood surFaee, Mr. <br /> z <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.